Cited by 850Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q-ball imaging

Open access
Descoteaux, Maxime, Angelino, Elaine, Fitzgibbons, Shaun, Deriche, Rachid·2007·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

We propose a regularized, fast, and robust analytical solution for the Q‐ball imaging (QBI) reconstruction of the orientation distribution function (ODF) together with its detailed validation and a discussion on its benefits over the state‐of‐the‐art. Our analytical solution is achieved by modeling the raw high angular resolution diffusion imaging signal with a spherical harmonic basis that incorporates a regularization term based on the Laplace–Beltrami operator defined on the unit sphere. This leads to an elegant mathematical simplification of the Funk–Radon transform which approximates the ODF. We prove a new corollary of the Funk–Hecke theorem to obtain this simplification. Then, we show that the Laplace–Beltrami regularization is theoretically and practically better than Tikhonov regularization. At the cost of slightly reducing angular resolution, the Laplace–Beltrami regularization reduces ODF estimation errors and improves fiber detection while reducing angular error in the ODF maxima detected. Finally, a careful quantitative validation is performed against ground truth from synthetic data and against real data from a biological phantom and a human brain dataset. We show that our technique is also able to recover known fiber crossings in the human brain and provides the practical advantage of being up to 15 times faster than original numerical QBI method. Magn Reson Med 58:497–510, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.21277

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TDF model addresses well-established limitations of the standard single-tensor diffusion model, which cannot resolve complex profiles of WM architecture such as crossing or mixing fibers, present in up to 90% of WM voxels.

    “The TDF model addresses well-established limitations of the standard single-tensor diffusion model—which cannot resolve complex profiles of WM architecture such as crossing or mixing fibers, present in up to 90% of WM voxels (Tournier et al., 2004; Descoteaux et al., 2007, 2009; Jeurissen et al., 2013).”

    From Diffusion MRI Indices and Their Relation to Cognitive Impairment in Brain Aging: The Updated Multi-protocol Approach in ADNI3 (2019) · cites this paper as Descoteaux et al., 2007

    The Introduction (page not available) describes DTI’s well-known limitations in regions with multiple fiber crossings, and Human Brain Data shows crossings recovered by Q-ball ODFs where DTI profiles are limited. This paper does not establish that crossing or mixing fibers occur in up to 90% of white-matter voxels, and it studies Q-ball imaging rather than the TDF model. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self- diffusion tensor from NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994;123:247- 254.
  2. Callaghan PT. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  3. Wedeen VJ, Reese TG, Tuch DS, Weigel MR, Dou J-G, Weiskoff RM, Chessler D. Mapping fiber orientation spectra in cerebral white matter with fourier-transform diffusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Philadelphia, 2000. p 82.
  4. Alexander DC, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Detection and modeling of non- Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:331-340.
  5. Frank LR. Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1083-1099.
  6. Ozarslan E, Mareci TH. Generalized diffusion tensor imaging and ana- lytical relationships between diffusion tensor imaging and high angular resolution imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:955-965.
  7. Zhan W, Gu H, Xu S, Silbersweig DA, Stern E, Yang Y. Circular spec- trum mapping for intravoxel fiber structures based on high angular resolution apparent diffusion coefficients. Magn Reson Med 2003;49: 1077-1088.
  8. Zhan W, Stein EA, Yang Y. Mapping the orientation of intravoxel cross- ing fibers based on the phase information of diffusion circular spectrum. NeuroImage 2004;23:1358-1369.
  9. Chen Y, Guo W, Zeng Q, Yan X, Huang F, Zhang H, He G, Vemuri BC, Liu Y. Estimation, smoothing and characterization of apparent diffusion coefficient profiles from high angular resolution DWI. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, Washington, DC, USA; 2004: pp. 588-593.
  10. Descoteaux M, Angelino E, Fitzgibbons S, Deriche R. Apparent diffusion coefficients from high angular resolution diffusion imaging: Estimation and applications. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:395-410.
  11. Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, Matthews PM, Brady JM, Smith SM. Characterization and prop- agation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1077-1088.
  12. Jansons KM, Alexander DC. Persistent angular structure: new insights from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data. Inverse Probl 2003;19:1031-1046.
  13. Tournier J-D, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution NeuroImage 2004;23:1176-1185.
  14. Alexander DC. Maximum entropy spherical deconvolution for diffusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Infor- mation Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), Glenwood Springs, CO, USA; 2005. pp. 76-87.
  15. Ozarslan E, Vemuri BC, Mareci TH. Fiber orientation mapping using generalized diffusion tensor imaging. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Arlington, Virginia, USA; April 2004. pp. 1036-1038.
  16. Chen Y, Guo W, Zeng Q, He G, Vemuri BC, Liu Y. Recovery of intra- voxel structure from HARD DWI. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Arlington, Virginia, USA; April 2004. pp. 1028-1031.
  17. Anderson AW. Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54:1194-1206.
  18. Perrin M, Poupon C, Cointepas Y, Rieul B, Golestani N, Pallier C, Riviere D, Constantinesco A, Bihan DL, Mangin JF. Fiber tracking in q-ball fields using regularized particle trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), Glenwood Springs, CO, USA; 2005. pp. 52-63.
  19. Descoteaux M, Angelino E, Fitzgibbons S, Deriche R. A fast and robust ODF estimation algorithm in q-ball imaging. In: IEEE International Sym- posium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Arlington, Virginia, USA; April 2006. pp. 81-84.
  20. Ozarslan E, Shepherd T, Vemuri BC, Blackband S, Mareci TH. Resolu- tion of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (DOT). NeuroImage 2006;31:1086-1103.
  21. Hess CP, Mukherjee P, Han ET, Xu D, Vigneron DB. Q-ball reconstruction of multimodal fiber orientations using the spherical harmonic basis. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:104-117.
  22. Hess CP, Mukherjee P, Han ET, Xu D, Vigneron DB. A spherical harmonic approach to q-ball imaging. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM 2005, Miami, Florida, USA; p. 389.
  23. Lin C, Wedeen V, Chen J, Yao C, Tseng WI. Validation of diffusion spec- trum magnetic resonance imaging with manganese-enhanced rat optic tracts and ex vivo phantoms. NeuroImage 2003;19:482-495.
  24. Savadjiev P, Campbell JSW, Pike BG, Siddiqi K. 3D curve inference for diffusion MRI regularization and fibre tractography. Med Image Anal 2006;10:799-813.
  25. Tuch DS, Wisco JJ, Khachaturian MH, Ekstrom LB, Kotter R, Vanduffel W. Q-ball imaging of macaque white matter architecture. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2005;360:869-879.
  26. Backus GE. Geophysical interpolation of measurements of average phase velocities of surface waves over great circular and semi-circular paths. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1964;54:571-610.
  27. Hansen PC. The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems. In: Johnston P, editor. Computational inverse problems in electrocardiology. Southampton: WIT Press; 2001. p 119-142.
  28. Andrews G, Askey R, Roy R. Special functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  29. Alexander DC, Barker GJ. Optimal imaging parameters for fiber- orientation estimation in diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 2005;27:357-367.
  30. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:515-525.
  31. Anwander A, Tittgemeyer M, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD, Knosche TR. Connectivity-based parcellation of broca's area. Cerebral Cortex; 2007;17:816-825. (available at http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/ cgi/content/abstract/bhk034v1)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Descoteaux, M., Angelino, E., Fitzgibbons, S., & Deriche, R.
Affiliations
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Descoteaux, Maxime
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-30
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
497-510
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2111508341
Cited by
850
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 66
FWCI
40.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
Q-ball imaging, orientation distribution function, high angular resolution diffusion imaging, Tikhonov regularization, tractography, analytical reconstruction, diffusion MRI
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Theoretical, Nerve Fibers, Spinal Cord, Time Factors, Artifacts, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Echo-Planar Imaging, Phantoms, Imaging, Models, Animal, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review