Cited by 1,113Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsTensor decomposition and applicationsMathematical Inequalities and Applications

Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors

Open access
Arsigny, Vincent, Fillard, Pierre, Pennec, Xavier, Ayache, Nicholas·2006·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DT‐MRI or DTI) is an emerging imaging modality whose importance has been growing considerably. However, the processing of this type of data (i.e., symmetric positive‐definite matrices), called “tensors” here, has proved difficult in recent years. Usual Euclidean operations on matrices suffer from many defects on tensors, which have led to the use of many ad hoc methods. Recently, affine‐invariant Riemannian metrics have been proposed as a rigorous and general framework in which these defects are corrected. These metrics have excellent theoretical properties and provide powerful processing tools, but also lead in practice to complex and slow algorithms. To remedy this limitation, a new family of Riemannian metrics called Log‐Euclidean is proposed in this article. They also have excellent theoretical properties and yield similar results in practice, but with much simpler and faster computations. This new approach is based on a novel vector space structure for tensors. In this framework, Riemannian computations can be converted into Euclidean ones once tensors have been transformed into their matrix logarithms. Theoretical aspects are presented and the Euclidean, affine‐invariant, and Log‐Euclidean frameworks are compared experimentally. The comparison is carried out on interpolation and regularization tasks on synthetic and clinical 3D DTI data. Magn Reson Med 56, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.20965

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The log-Euclidean distance addresses several issues with using Frobenius distances for positive semidefinite matrices.

    “We choose to compute dissimilarities between functional connectivity matrices using the log-Euclidean distance (Arsigny et al. 2006), which addresses several issues with using Frobenius distances for positive semidefinite matrices.”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as Arsigny et al. 2006

    “The Defects of Euclidean Calculus” identifies problems with Frobenius-distance-based tensor calculations, and says log-Euclidean metrics preserve positive-definiteness. But the Conclusions state that the framework assumes positive-definite tensors; the claim’s broader reference to positive semidefinite matrices includes matrices with zero eigenvalues, which the paper does not cover. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Westin CF, Maier SE, Mamata H, Nabavi A, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. Pro- cessing and visualization of diffusion tensor MRI. Med Image Anal 2002; 6:93-108.
  2. Chefd'hotel C, Tschumperlé D, Deriche R, Faugeras O. Regularizing flows for constrained matrix-valued images. J Math Imaging Vis 2004; 20:147-162.
  3. Gallot S, Hulin D, Lafontaine J. Riemannian geometry, 2nd ed. Springer- Verlag, 1993.
  4. Fletcher PT, Joshi SC. Principal geodesic analysisee on symmetric spaces: statistics of diffusion tensors. In: Proceedings of CVAMIA and MMBIA Workshops, Prague, Czech Republic, May 15, 2004, LNCS 3117, Springer, 2004. p 87-98.
  5. Bourbaki N. Elements of mathematics: lie groups and lie algebra, 2nd ed., Ch 1-3, Springer-Verlag, 1989.
  6. Tarantola A. Elements for physics-quantities, qualities, and instrinsic theories. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
  7. Pennec X. L'incertitude dans les problèmes de reconnaissance et de recalage-applications en imagerie médicale et biologie moléculaire. Thèse de sciences (PhD thesis), Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau (France), 1996.
  8. Wang Z, Vemuri BC, Chen Y, Mareci TH. A constrained variational prin- ciple for simultaneous smoothing and estimation of the diffusion tensors from complex DWI data. IEEE TMI 2004;23:930-939.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arsigny, V., Fillard, P., Pennec, X., & Ayache, N.
Affiliations
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Arsigny, Vincent
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-20
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2048192550
Cited by
1,113
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 75
FWCI
34.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
Keywords
diffusion tensor imaging, Log-Euclidean metric, Riemannian metrics, symmetric positive definite matrices, matrix logarithm, affine invariance, tensor interpolation, regularization
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mathematics, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review