The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI
Abstract
An empirical equation for the magnetization transfer (MT) FLASH signal is derived by analogy to dual‐excitation FLASH, introducing a novel semiquantitative parameter for MT, the percentage saturation imposed by one MT pulse during TR. This parameter is obtained by a linear transformation of the inverse signal, using two reference experiments of proton density and T1 weighting. The influence of sequence parameters on the MT saturation was studied. An 8.5‐min protocol for brain imaging at 3 T was based on nonselective sagittal 3D‐FLASH at 1.25 mm isotropic resolution using partial acquisition techniques (TR/TE/α = 25ms/4.9ms/5° or 11ms/4.9ms/15° for the T1 reference). A 12.8 ms Gaussian MT pulse was applied 2.2 kHz off‐resonance with 540° flip angle. The MT saturation maps showed an excellent contrast in the brain due to clearly separated distributions for white and gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid. Within the limits of the approximation (excitation <15°, TR/T1 ≪ 1) the MT term depends mainly on TR, the energy and offset of the MT pulse, but hardly on excitation and T1 relaxation. It is inherently compensated for inhomogeneities of receive and transmit RF fields. The MT saturation appeared to be a sensitive parameter to depict MS lesions and alterations of normal‐appearing white matter. Magn Reson Med 60:1396–1407, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo
Wolff, S. D., & Balaban, R. S. (1989) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910100113 · Cited by 1,482
Yarnykh, V. L. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21120 · Cited by 1,026
Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer
Henkelman, R. M., Huang, X., Xiang, Q., Stanisz, G. J., Swanson, S. D., & Bronskill, M. J. (1993) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910290607 · Cited by 734
Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI
Sled, J. G., & Pike, G. B. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1278 · Cited by 419
Deichmann, R., Schwarzbauer, C., & Turner, R. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.062 · Cited by 391
Edzes, H. T., & Samulski, E. T. (1978) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(78)90185-3 · Cited by 375
A Model for Magnetization Transfer in Tissues
Morrison, C., & Mark Henkelman, R. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330404 · Cited by 305
Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times
Ramani, A., Dalton, C., Miller, D. H., Tofts, P. S., & Barker, G. J. (2002) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00598-2 · Cited by 240
Quantitative FLASH MRI at 3T using a rational approximation of the Ernst equation
Helms, G., Dathe, H., & Dechent, P. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21542 · Cited by 231
Self-citationYarnykh, V. L. (2002) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10120 · Cited by 173
Understanding pulsed magnetization transfer
Graham, S. J., & Henkelman, R. M. (1997) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1880070520 · Cited by 159
Pike, G. B. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360117 · Cited by 119
MT effects and T1 quantification in single‐slice spoiled gradient echo imaging
Ou, X., & Gochberg, D. F. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21550 · Cited by 62
Rapid radiofrequency field mapping in vivo using single‐shot STEAM MRI
Helms, G., Finsterbusch, J., Weiskopf, N., & Dechent, P. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21676 · Cited by 45
Self-citationImprovement of the image quality of T1-weighted anatomical brain scans
Howarth, C., Hutton, C., & Deichmann, R. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.004 · Cited by 33
Helms, G., & Piringer, A. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(01)00396-4 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Cited by
Schweser, F., Deistung, A., Lehr, B. W., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.070 · Cited by 710
Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation
Weiskopf, N., Suckling, J., Williams, G., Correia, M. M., Inkster, B., Tait, R., Ooi, C., Bullmore, E. T., & Lutti, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00095 · Cited by 538
Alexander, A. L., Hurley, S. A., Samsonov, A. A., Adluru, N., Hosseinbor, A. P., Mossahebi, P., Tromp, D. P. M., Zakszewski, E., & Field, A. S. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0071 · Cited by 449
Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination
Lutti, A., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., & Weiskopf, N. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005 · Cited by 346
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain anatomy and in vivo histology
Weiskopf, N., Edwards, L. J., Helms, G., Mohammadi, S., & Kirilina, E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00326-1 · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Helms, G., Dathe, H., Kallenberg, K., & Dechent, P.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1396-1407
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2094514781
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
