Cited by 53Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

MRI artifacts in human brain tissue after prolonged formalin storage

van Duijn, Sara, Nabuurs, Rob J. A., van Rooden, Sanneke, Maat‐Schieman, Marion L. C., van Duinen, Sjoerd G., van Buchem, Mark A., van der Weerd, Louise, Natté, Remco·2011·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

For the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in brain pathology, often ex vivo tissue is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the pathological substrate of several distinct forms of MR hypointensities that were found in formalin-fixed brain tissue with amyloid-beta deposits. Samples of brain cortex were scanned using effective transverse relaxation time-weighted protocols at several resolutions on a 9.4 T MRI scanner. High resolution MRI showed large coarse hypointensities throughout the cortical gray and white matter, corresponding to macroscopic discolorations and microscopic circumscribed areas of granular basophilic neuropil changes, without any further specific tissue reactions or amyloid-beta related pathology. These coarse MRI hypointensities were identified as localized areas of absent neuropil replaced by membrane/myelin sheath remnants using electron microscopy. Interestingly, the presence/absence of these tissue alterations was not related to amyloid deposits, but strongly correlated to the fixation time of the samples in unrefreshed formalin. These findings show that prolonged storaged of formalin fixed brain tissue results in subtle histology artifacts, which show on MRI as hypointensities that on first appearance are indistinguishable from genuine brain pathology. This indicates that postmortem MRI should be interpreted with caution, especially if the history of tissue preservation is not fully known.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.22758

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Duijn, S., Nabuurs, R. J. A., van Rooden, S., Maat‐Schieman, M. L. C., van Duinen, S. G., van Buchem, M. A., van der Weerd, L., & Natté, R.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-08
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1750-1758
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2043543187
Cited by
53
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
MRI artifacts, formalin fixation, amyloid-beta, neuropil, fixation duration, ex vivo brain tissue, electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Diseases, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Tissue Preservation, Case-Control Studies, Artifacts, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review