Cited by 189Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMedical and Biological SciencesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus: A Review of the Anatomical Descriptions With Functional Correlates

Open access
Janelle, Felix, Iorio-Morin, Christian, D'amour, Sabrina, Fortin, David·2022·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) is part of the longitudinal association fiber system, which lays connections between the frontal lobe and other areas of the ipsilateral hemisphere. As a dominant association fiber bundle, it should correspond to a well-defined structure with a clear anatomical definition. However, this is not the case, and a lot of confusion and overlap surrounds this entity. In this review/opinion study, we survey relevant current literature on the topic and try to clarify the definition of SLF in each hemisphere. After a comparison of postmortem dissections and data obtained from diffusion MRI studies, we discuss the specifics of this bundle regarding its anatomical landmarks, differences in lateralization, as well as individual variability. We also discuss the confusion regarding the arcuate fasciculus in relation to the SLF. Finally, we recommend a nomenclature based on the findings exposed in this review and finalize with a discussion on relevant functional correlates of the structure.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review/opinion argues that the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) remains anatomically and nomenclaturally controversial, despite being a major association fiber system. It recommends distinguishing the SLF from the arcuate fasciculus, questioning SLF I as separate from the cingulum, and recognizing asymmetric SLF II/III functional roles.

Key findings

  • The SLF is best defined as a fronto-parietal tract, whereas the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is a fronto-temporal tract; classifications that include the AF as part of the SLF are described as misleading.
  • SLF I, connecting parietal precuneus to superior frontal gyrus, appears assimilable to the cingulum, so its existence and role are unclear; SLF II and SLF III are described as distinct and asymmetric, with left-sided SLF II/III implicated in speech processing and right-sided SLF II/III in visuospatial functioning.
  • Wang et al.’s combined dMRI (\(n=10\)) and dissection (\(n=5\)) study found SLF II represented about 66% of total SLF volume and SLF III about 33%; left SLF II connectivity was linked to motor planning of language and/or syntax, right SLF II to attention regulation in spatial orientation.
  • The review highlights dMRI validation problems: 63–90% of white matter volume is estimated to contain crossing fibers, and in an international tractography competition most tractograms contained more invalid than valid bundles.

Methods

  • Narrative review/opinion based on a literature survey of SLF anatomy, nomenclature, lateralization, individual variability, AF relationship, and functional correlates.
  • The authors compare postmortem dissection and diffusion MRI/tractography studies and summarize studies reporting 2, 3, 3 plus AF, and 5 SLF divisions in a table.
  • No original cohort is analyzed; illustrative figures use open-source MRI images and the Imeka test tractogram, with segmentation methods derived from Wakana et al. and Fitzgerald et al.

Limitations

  • The authors state that inter- and intra-individual variability is greater than previously suspected and recommend larger cohorts; they also note that cited studies often have low subject numbers.
  • The authors discuss dMRI pitfalls including false positives, poor inter-protocol segmentation agreement, and orientation errors up to 90° at gray-white matter transitions; postmortem dissection cannot resolve crossing fibers or distal terminations and is biased toward elderly brains and fixation effects.
  • Evident from the text: as a review/opinion without a systematic search or quantitative synthesis, its nomenclature recommendations are expert opinion rather than empirically tested consensus.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2022.794618

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

22 of 62 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Histological postmortem studies have shown a consistent failure of dMRI in regions of transition between white and gray matter, where orientation errors of as much as 90° have been observed.

    “However, there is one domain where histological postmortem studies have shown a consistent failure of dMRI, which is in regions of transition between white and gray matter, where orientation errors of as much as 90° have been observed (49, 50).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Dyrby, 2007, Validation of in vitro probabilistic tractography, Neuroimage source
    • cites [50] Seehaus, 2015, Histological validation of high-resolution DTI in human post mortem tissue, Front Neuroanat source

      The Results (Orientation differences) say that at the white-to-gray-matter transition, orientation differences often remained small despite reduced FA. The near-90° differences were instead found mostly in bands within gray matter, at intermediate cortical depths (Discussion, Orientations). Thus the paper does not describe a consistent failure at the transition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Postmortem factors such as the interval between death and fixation, and the known effects of the fixative on the tissue, can alter results.

    “Postmortem factors, such as the interval between death and fixation, as well as the known effects of the fixative on the tissue can also alter results (18–21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [18] Chu, 2005, Ultrasound-accelerated formalin fixation of tissue improves morphology, antigen and mRNA preservation, Mod Pathol source
    • cites [19] Schmierer, 2008, Quantitative magnetic resonance of postmortem multiple sclerosis brain before and after fixation, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine source
    • cites [20] Stüber, 2014, Myelin and iron concentration in the human brain: a quantitative study of MRI contrast, NeuroImage source
    • cites [21] van Duijn, 2011, artifacts in human brain tissue after prolonged formalin storage, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine source
  • Premisecitation

    Most tractograms produced in the international tractography competition were made up of more invalid than valid bundles.

    “Indeed, they found that most tractograms produced in this competition were made up of more invalid than valid bundles (52).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Maier-Hein, 2017, The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography, Nat Commun source
  • Premisecitation

    The right-sided SLF as a whole appears more voluminous than the left-sided SLF.

    “overall, the right-sided SLF as a whole appears more voluminous than on the left (3, 55).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Martino, 2013, Analysis of the subcomponents and cortical terminations of the perisylvian superior longitudinal fasciculus: a fiber dissection and DTI tractography study, Brain Struct Funct source
    • cites [55] Hecht, 2015, Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans, Neuroimage source
  • Premisecitation

    Current state-of-the-art tractography algorithms do not control for false positives.

    “One of them was that current state-of-the-art tractography algorithms do not control for false positives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Maier-Hein, 2017, The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography, Nat Commun source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies describe a fifth division of the SLF comprised of a distinct fasciculus that connects the superior temporal gyrus to the superior parietal.

    “Indeed, some studies even describe a fifth division of the SLF comprised of a distinct fasciculus (61–63) that would connect the superior temporal gyrus to the superior parietal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [61] Frey, 2008, Dissociating the human language pathways with high angular resolution diffusion fiber tractography, J Neurosci source
    • cites [62] Makris, 2009, Delineation of the middle longitudinal fascicle in humans: A quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study, Cerebral Cortex source

      The Abstract and Discussion identify the tract as the middle longitudinal fascicle, connecting the superior temporal gyrus to the angular gyrus of the inferior parietal lobule—not the superior parietal region. The Discussion also explicitly describes it as distinct from the SLF, rather than a fifth division of it. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [63] Zhang, 2010, Atlas-guided tract reconstruction for automated and comprehensive examination of the white matter anatomy, Neuroimage source

      The Results (Comparison between the automated and manual methods; page unavailable) describe a separately reconstructed SLF segment connecting the parietal and temporal lobes. They do not call it a fifth division or identify its endpoints as the superior temporal gyrus and superior parietal region; the parietal regions specified are the angular and supramarginal gyri. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Classical DTI postmortem histological validation studies have shown that fiber orientation is correctly represented in large unidirectional fiber bundles, but fails in complex regions with fiber crossings and low anisotropy.

    “Classical DTI postmortem histological validation studies have shown that fiber orientation is correctly represented in large unidirectional fiber bundles, but fails in complex regions with fiber crossings and low anisotropy (44–46).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [44] Dauguet, 2007, Comparison of fiber tracts derived from in-vivo DTI tractography with 3D histological neural tract tracer reconstruction on a macaque brain, Neuroimage source
    • cites [45] Kaufman, 2005, Anatomical analysis of an aye-aye brain (Daubentonia madagascariensis, primates: prosimii) combining histology, structural magnetic resonance imaging, and diffusion-tensor imaging, Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol source

      The Diffusion-Tensor Imaging section (page unavailable) reports good correspondence between DTI and histological measurements in the cingulum bundle, supporting the claim for coherent fibers. It also finds broader fiber-orientation distributions where anisotropy is low, but does not show that DTI fails there or test regions with crossing fibers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [46] Fernandez-Miranda, 2008, Three-dimensional microsurgical and tractographic anatomy of the white matter of the human brain, Neurosurgery source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A great many studies clearly distinguish the AF and SLF as distinct entities, both anatomically and functionally.

    “A great many studies clearly distinguish the 2 bundles as distinct entities, both anatomically and functionally (56, 59, 70, 71, 75, 76).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
    • cites [59] Cabeen, 2016, Kernel regression estimation of fiber orientation mixtures in diffusion MRI, Neuroimage source

      The Results (§5.5; page unavailable) describe the arcuate fasciculus and three portions of the superior longitudinal fasciculus separately, supporting an anatomical distinction. The paper does not address whether they are functionally distinct or establish that a great many studies distinguish them on both grounds. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [70] Catani, 2012, Atlas of Human Brain Connections source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individual variability is a correlate of phenotypic variability in general, determined by genetic substrates and environmental exposure.

    “This variability is a correlate of the phenotypic variability in general, determined by the genetic substrates and the environmental exposure that shapes this diversity for any trait, including the brain's anatomy, (68)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] Hill, 2010, Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution, PNAS source

      The Discussion considers intrinsic and extrinsic signals in the maturation of cortical areas and suggests that postnatal experience may contribute to development in some regions. It does not address whether genetic substrates and environmental exposure determine variability among individuals or phenotypic variability across traits (searched: individual variability, genetics, environment, and phenotype). (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SLF is a fronto-parietal tract connecting the frontal and parietal cortices, and it is a massive bundle connecting widespread areas of the frontal and parietal lobes.

    “the SLF is in its essence a fronto-parietal tract, hence connecting the frontal and parietal cortices”
    • Also stated in: § Functional Correlates of SLF · plain
      “The SLF is a massive bundle connecting widespread areas of the frontal and the parietal lobes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Hecht, 2015, Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans, Neuroimage source
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AF is recognized as a distinctive bundle with connection areas and a trajectory different from that of the SLF.

    “the AF is recognized as a distinctive bundle with connection areas and a trajectory different from that of the SLF”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Hecht, 2015, Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans, Neuroimage source
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fractional anisotropy of the SLF varies between individuals, but less importantly than volume.

    “Fractional anisotropy of SLF also varies between individuals, but less importantly, than volume (67, 68).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [67] Good, 2001, voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains, Neuroimage source
    • cites [68] Hill, 2010, Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution, PNAS source

      The Results and Materials and Methods passages discuss individual differences in cortical surface area and patterns of cortical expansion, not the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Searches for SLF fractional anisotropy and its variability relative to volume found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AF is a fronto-temporal tract that passes through the parietal white matter beneath the SLF.

    “whereas the AF is a fronto-temporal tract that passes through the parietal white matter beneath the SLF (55, 56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Hecht, 2015, Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans, Neuroimage source
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A lot of prior work in the literature and anatomy textbooks is based on non-human primates, which present a rather different connectivity anatomy, thus steering the nomenclature toward a biased pattern.

    “a lot of the prior work which has made its way in the literature and anatomy textbooks is based on non-human primates, which present a rather different connectivity anatomy, thus steering the nomenclature toward a biased pattern (5, 56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] Mandonnet, 2018, The nomenclature of human white matter association pathways: proposal for a systematic taxonomic anatomical classification, Front Neuroanat source
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SLF is likely to be one of the most affected fiber bundles whenever surgery for an intrinsic brain tumor is undertaken.

    “As such, this fiber bundle is likely to be one of the most affected whenever we undertake a surgery for an intrinsic brain tumor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SLF is part of the longitudinal association fiber system, which lays connections between the frontal lobe and other areas of the ipsilateral hemisphere.
    • Rests on an assumption: The SLF connects the perisylvian areas in the hemisphere (frontal, temporal, and parietal).
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The superior longitudinal fasciculus lacks a clear anatomical definition, and a lot of confusion and overlap surrounds this entity.

    “However, this is not the case, and a lot of confusion and overlap surrounds this entity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There are asymmetric findings between the right and left SLF.

    “It stands to reason that there would be asymmetric findings between both SLF.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a clear asymmetry in speech function (left-sided characteristically) and visuospatial functioning (right-sided characteristically).
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Bernal & Altman's DTI study found that projection to Broca's area was minimal or absent in the majority of cases.

    “In this diffusion tensor imaging study, the SLF of 12 normal right-handed participants was assessed to find that projection to Broca's area was minimal or absent in the majority of cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Bernal, 2010, The connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus: A tractography DTI study, Magn Reson Imaging source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wang et al. consider the SLF as only composed of a dorsal (SLF II) and a ventral (SLF III) segment.

    “Hence, they consider the SLF as only composed of a dorsal (SLF II) and a ventral (SLF III) segment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wang et al. found a slight asymmetric difference in all SLF sub-components with a tendency toward right-hemispheric dominance.

    “Wang et al., on the other hand, found a slight asymmetric difference in all SLF sub-component with a tendency toward right-hemispheric dominance (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Wang et al.'s construct, the SLF II represents 66% of the total volume, whereas the SLF III about 33%.

    “In this construct, the SLF II represents 66% of the total volume, whereas the SLF III about 33%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wang et al. concluded that there is a high discrepancy between the simian and human anatomy, so all conclusions derived from the study of the former cannot be applied to the latter.

    “The first conclusion is that there is a high discrepancy between the simian and human anatomy; hence, all conclusions derived from the study of the former cannot be applied to the latter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is no such thing as a singular brain blueprint.

    “There is no such thing as a singular brain blueprint!”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Some areas and connectivity routes are highly conserved amongst individuals (such as primary areas and large projection bundles), while others are more variable.
    • Rests on an assumption: The brain connectivity pattern of an individual is constantly changing, and the density of white matter changes during the development of the individual.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The inclusion of the AF as the 4th component of the SLF is far from unanimous and remains a subject of controversy in the nomenclature.

    “However, the inclusion of the AF as the 4th component of the SLF is far from unanimous and remains a subject of controversy in the nomenclature that is addressed in a later section of this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The lateralization of SLF II subcomponents is dominant in the left hemisphere.

    “other researchers found the SLF II subcomponents' lateralization to be dominant in the left hemisphere (7, 56, 72).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
    • cites [56] Thiebaut de Schotten, 2011, Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts, Cortex source
    • cites [72] Vernooij, 2007, Fiber density asymmetry of the arcuate fasciculus in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization in both right- and left-handed healthy subjects: a combined fMRI and DTI study, Neuroimage source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    This is an illustration of the poor consensus on the precise anatomical definition of white matter bundles.

    “This is an illustration of the poor consensus on the precise anatomical definition of white matter bundles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some difference in connectivity between the hemispheres is expected.

    “some difference in connectivity is expected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a clear asymmetry in speech function (left-sided characteristically) and visuospatial functioning (right-sided characteristically).
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The first three SLF subdivisions are usually reported alike in most studies, except for a few minor differences.

    “The first three SLF subdivisions are usually reported alike in most studies, except for a few minor differences (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Wang et al.'s findings are provocative, differing from the rest of the literature and challenging the current knowledge on the SLF.

    “Their findings are rather provocative, differing from the rest of the literature and challenging the current knowledge on the SLF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The leftward lateralization of SLF II is functionally related to its role in language.

    “This would functionally be related to its role in language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This finding contradicts the preconceived SLF structure and role, and does not represent the dominant consensus.

    “This finding contradicts the preconceived SLF structure and role, and does not represent the dominant consensus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Martino et al. used dMRI and cortex-sparing fiber dissection and concluded that there were two segments to the SLF, an anterior and a posterior segment.

    “Martino et al. used dMRI and cortex-sparing fiber dissection and came to the conclusion that there were two segments to the SLF, an anterior and a posterior segment, much like Martino et al. and Wang et al. (3, 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Martino, 2013, Analysis of the subcomponents and cortical terminations of the perisylvian superior longitudinal fasciculus: a fiber dissection and DTI tractography study, Brain Struct Funct source
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long associative axons comprise only 2% of the total intrahemispheric cortico-cortical fibers, and 98% of the fibers are short U-fibers.

    “these long associative axons comprise only 2% of the total intrahemispheric cortico-cortical fibers and that 98% of the fibers are short U-fibers (74).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] Duffau, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Other authors also support the idea that the SLF is indeed comprised of two main divisions.

    “Other authors also support the idea that the SLF is indeed comprised of two main divisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The left SLF II has a role in motor planning of speech and/or syntax processing.

    “This would be in keeping with a role for the left SLF II in motor planning of speech and/or syntax processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The asymmetry between the hemispheres must translate into obvious functional implications.

    “As the bundle depicts clear asymmetry between both hemispheres, this must translate into obvious functional implications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a clear asymmetry in speech function (left-sided characteristically) and visuospatial functioning (right-sided characteristically).
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The anterior segment of the AF appears to correspond to the SLF III, and the two terms are used interchangeably.

    “the anterior segment of the AF appears to somehow correspond to the SLF III, and the two terms are used interchangeably.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Catani, 2012, Atlas of Human Brain Connections source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SLF II and III are clearly defined as distinct entities that are asymmetrical in their function and presumably in their role.

    “The SLF II and III are clearly defined as distinct entities that are asymmetrical in their function as well as presumably in their role”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The right SLF III connectivity pattern is probably involved in spatial awareness functioning.

    “According to some authors, this connectivity pattern is probably involved in spatial awareness functioning (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Wang, 2016, Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain, Brain Struct Funct source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The SLF in its current definition is not a consensual entity.

    “the SLF itself in its current definition is not a consensual entity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Individual variability had been underestimated in the past.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The definition of the SLF as connecting the frontal to the parietal lobe allows a clear distinction with the AF, which connects the frontal lobe to the temporal lobe.

    “the very definition of the SLF, connecting the frontal to the parietal lobe, allows a clear distinction with the AF, connecting the frontal lobe to the temporal lobe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The existence and role of the SLF I are unclear at this time.

    “its existence, as well as its role is unclear at this time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SLF is part of the longitudinal association fiber system, which lays connections between the frontal lobe and other areas of the ipsilateral hemisphere.

    “The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) is part of the longitudinal association fiber system, which lays connections between the frontal lobe and other areas of the ipsilateral hemisphere.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SLF connects the perisylvian areas in the hemisphere (frontal, temporal, and parietal).

    “To put it simply, it connects the perisylvian areas in the hemisphere (frontal, temporal, and parietal).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a clear asymmetry in speech function (left-sided characteristically) and visuospatial functioning (right-sided characteristically).

    “As there is a clear asymmetry in speech function (left-sided characteristically) and visuospatial functioning (right-sided characteristically)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some areas and connectivity routes are highly conserved amongst individuals (such as primary areas and large projection bundles), while others are more variable.

    “Although some areas and connectivity routes are highly conserved amongst individuals (such as primary areas and large projection bundles), others are more variable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The brain connectivity pattern of an individual is constantly changing, and the density of white matter changes during the development of the individual.

    “the brain connectivity pattern of an individual is constantly changing, and the density of white matter has been shown to change during the development of the individual.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Individual variability had been underestimated in the past.

    “the individual variability had been underestimated in the past.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Left SLF II origin conflicts with the Wang et al. table entry

    Major

    The text attributes a left SLF II connection from the supramarginal gyrus to Wang et al., but Table 1 lists the angular gyrus as the origin of Wang et al.'s left SLF II. The table instead assigns the supramarginal gyrus to the left SLF III.

  • Wang et al. are cited for opposite SLF lateralization patterns

    Minor

    The lateralization section cites Wang et al. (7) among studies finding left-dominant SLF II lateralization, then says Wang et al. found a tendency toward right-hemispheric dominance in all SLF subcomponents, which includes SLF II.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Descoteaux, 2015, Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (EEEE), High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI)
  2. Rheault, 2016, MI-Brain, a Software to Handle Tractograms and Perform Interactive Virtual Dissection

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janelle, F., Iorio-Morin, C., D'amour, S., & Fortin, D.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Fortin, David
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
13
Pages
794618-794618
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224927688
Cited by
189
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 1
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, arcuate fasciculus, frontal lobe, anatomical landmarks, hemispheric lateralization, interindividual variability, diffusion MRI, postmortem dissection, functional correlates, white matter tracts, nomenclature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review