The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation
Open accessAbstract
Zero echo time can be obtained in MRI by performing radiofrequency (RF) excitation as well as acquisition in the presence of a constant gradient applied for purely frequency‐encoded, radial centre‐out k‐space encoding. In this approach, the spatially nonselective excitation must uniformly cover the full frequency bandwidth spanned by the readout gradient. This can be accomplished either by short, hard RF pulses or by pulses with a frequency sweep as used in the SWIFT (Sweep imaging with Fourier transform) method for improved performance at limited RF amplitudes. In this work, the two options are compared with respect to T2 sensitivity, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and SNR efficiency. In particular, the SNR implications of sweep excitation and of initial or periodical acquisition gaps required for transmit‐receive switching are investigated. It was found by simulations and experiments that, whereas equivalent in terms of T2 sensitivity, the two techniques differ in SNR performance. With ideal, ungapped simultaneous excitation and acquisition, the sweep approach would yield higher SNR throughout due to larger feasible flip angles. However, acquisition gapping is found to take a significant SNR toll related to a reduced acquisition duty cycle, rendering hard pulse excitation superior for sufficient RF amplitude and also in the short‐T2 limit. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker
Wang, Y., & Liu, T. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 · Cited by 878
Optimized 3D ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI
Johnson, K. M., Fain, S. B., Schiebler, M. L., & Nagle, S. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24570 · Cited by 322
MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture
Chang, G., Boone, S., Martel, D., Rajapakse, C. S., Hallyburton, R. S., Valko, M., Honig, S., & Regatte, R. R. (2017) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.25647 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiger, M., Pruessmann, K. P., & Hennel, F.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-389
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1968086476
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.22799
- The paper
- Weiger, M., Pruessmann, K. P., & Hennel, F. (2011). MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.