The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommended implementation of arterial spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia
Open accessAbstract
This review provides a summary statement of recommended implementations of arterial spin labeling (ASL) for clinical applications. It is a consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European ASL in Dementia consortium, both of whom met to reach this consensus in October 2012 in Amsterdam. Although ASL continues to undergo rapid technical development, we believe that current ASL methods are robust and ready to provide useful clinical information, and that a consensus statement on recommended implementations will help the clinical community to adopt a standardized approach. In this review, we describe the major considerations and trade‐offs in implementing an ASL protocol and provide specific recommendations for a standard approach. Our conclusion is that as an optimal default implementation, we recommend pseudo‐continuous labeling, background suppression, a segmented three‐dimensional readout without vascular crushing gradients, and calculation and presentation of both label/control difference images and cerebral blood flow in absolute units using a simplified model. Magn Reson Med 73:102–116, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with optimized tagging efficiency
Shin, D. D., Liu, T. T., Wong, E. C., Shankaranarayanan, A., & Jung, Y. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24113 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Cited by
Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease—advances since 2013
Duering, M., Biessels, G. J., Brodtmann, A., Chen, C., Cordonnier, C., de Leeuw, F.-E., Debette, S., Frayne, R., Jouvent, E., Rost, N. S., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00131-x · Cited by 1,144
Self-citationNature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510459112 · Cited by 932
Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., Kriegeskorte, N., Milham, M. P., Poldrack, R. A., Poline, J.-B., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4500 · Cited by 714
Imaging and fluid biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia
Meeter, L. H., Kaat, L. D., Rohrer, J. D., & van Swieten, J. C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.75 · Cited by 210
Neurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer's disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging
van de Haar, H. J., Jansen, J. F. A., van Osch, M. J. P., van Buchem, M. A., Muller, M., Wong, S. M., Hofman, P. A. M., Burgmans, S., Verhey, F. R. J., & Backes, W. H. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.06.006 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Alsop, D. C., Detre, J. A., Golay, X., Günther, M., Hendrikse, J., Hernandez‐Garcia, L., Lu, H., MacIntosh, B. J., Parkes, L. M., Smits, M., van Osch, M. J. P., Wang, D. J. J., Wong, E. C., & Zaharchuk, G.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-116
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2116641010
- Cited by
- 2,206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 96.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
