Cited by 37Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with optimized tagging efficiency

Open access
Shin, David D., Liu, Thomas T., Wong, Eric C., Shankaranarayanan, Ajit, Jung, Youngkyoo·2012·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

The adiabatic inversion of blood in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) is highly sensitive to off‐resonance effects and gradient imperfections and this sensitivity can lead to tagging efficiency loss and unpredictable variations in cerebral blood flow estimates. This efficiency loss is caused by a phase tracking error between the RF pulses and the flowing spins. This article introduces a new method, referred to as Optimized PCASL (OptPCASL), that minimizes the phase tracking error by applying an additional compensation RF phase term and in‐plane gradients to the PCASL pulse train. The optimal RF phase and gradient amplitudes are determined using a prescan procedure, which consists of a series of short scans interleaved with automated postprocessing routines integrated to the scanner console. The prescan procedure is shown to minimize the phase tracking error in a robust and time efficient manner. As an example of its application, the use of OptPCASL for the improved detection of functional activation in the visual cortex is demonstrated and temporal signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), image SNR, and baseline cerebral blood flow measures are compared to those acquired from conventional PCASL. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.24113

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, D. D., Liu, T. T., Wong, E. C., Shankaranarayanan, A., & Jung, Y.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shin, David D.
  • Jung, Youngkyoo
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-03
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
1135-1144
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W1975559674
Cited by
37
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01MH084796)
  • Research grant support from General Electric Healthcare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling, tagging efficiency, adiabatic inversion, cerebral blood flow, visual cortex activation, temporal signal-to-noise ratio
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spin Labels, Visual Cortex, Reproducibility of Results, Magnetic Resonance Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review