Fast 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting for a whole‐brain coverage
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to accelerate the acquisition and reconstruction time of 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting scans. Methods: A 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting scan was accelerated by using a single‐shot spiral trajectory with an undersampling factor of 48 in the x‐y plane, and an interleaved sampling pattern with an undersampling factor of 3 through plane. Further acceleration came from reducing the waiting time between neighboring partitions. The reconstruction time was accelerated by applying singular value decomposition compression in k‐space. Finally, a 3D premeasured B 1 map was used to correct for the B 1 inhomogeneity. Results: The T 1 and T 2 values of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology MRI phantom showed a good agreement with the standard values, with an average concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99, and coefficient of variation of 7% in the repeatability scans. The results from in vivo scans also showed high image quality in both transverse and coronal views. Conclusions: This study applied a fast acquisition scheme for a fully quantitative 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting scan with a total acceleration factor of 144 as compared with the Nyquist rate, such that 3D T 1, T 2, and proton density maps can be acquired with whole‐brain coverage at clinical resolution in less than 5 min. Magn Reson Med 79:2190–2197, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MRF can be regarded as a quantitative multiparametric MRI analysis, and with recent acquisition schemes using a single-shot spiral trajectory with undersampling, whole-brain coverage of T1, T2 and proton density maps can be acquired at 1.2 × 1.2 × 3 mm3 voxel resolution in less than 5 min.
“It can be regarded as a quantitative multiparametric MRI analysis, and with recent acquisition schemes using a single-shot spiral trajectory with undersampling, whole-brain coverage of T 1 , T 2 and proton density maps can be acquired at 1 . 2 × 1 . 2 × 3 mm 3 voxel resolution in less than 5 min [159].”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [159]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting
Ma, D., Gulani, V., Seiberlich, N., Liu, K., Sunshine, J. L., Duerk, J. L., & Griswold, M. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11971 · Cited by 1,577 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
Teixeira, R. P. A. G., Malik, S. J., & Hajnal, J. V. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.26670 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ma, D., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., McGivney, D., Mehta, B., Gulani, V., & Griswold, M.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Griswold, Mark
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-22
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2190-2197
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- PMC
- PMC5868964
- OpenAlex
- W2748563428
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (1R01EB016728‐01A1, 5R01EB017219‐02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- whole-brain imaging, accelerated MRI acquisition, undersampling, interleaved sampling, k-space reconstruction, B1 mapping, B1 inhomogeneity correction, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, proton density mapping, quantitative MRI
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Reproducibility of Results, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Data Compression, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
