Cited by 39Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Joint system relaxometry (JSR) and Crámer‐Rao lower bound optimization of sequence parameters: A framework for enhanced precision of DESPOT T1 and T2 estimation

Open access
Teixeira, Rui Pedro A.G., Malik, Shaihan J., Hajnal, Joseph V.·2018·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to increase the precision of single‐compartment DESPOT relaxometry by two means: (i) a joint system relaxometry (JSR) approach that estimates parameters in a single step using all available data; and (ii) optimizing acquisition parameters by deploying a robust design tool based on the Crámer‐Rao lower bound (CRLB). Methods: Following the development of the analysis and design capabilities, phantom and four in vivo subject experiments were performed to compare directly the precision achieved with DESPOT and JSR estimation using published protocols and protocols designed using a proposed CRLB framework. Results: Experimental data demonstrate JSR's ability to decrease relaxometry estimation variance. Phantom results show 72 to 77% improvement using the same data as conventional DESPOT. This is further improved to 81 to 87% using optimal parameters. Both experiments show systematic bias depending on the acquisition parameters used, which are shown to be highly reproducible and to vary with different magnetization transfer conditions. Conclusions: Compared with DESPOT, JSR produces reproducible relaxation maps with improved precision. Further improvement was achieved using CRLB as a protocol design tool. With this combined approach, it is possible to achieve submillimeter maps of in an 11‐min examination, making the approach appealing for potential clinical use. Magn Reson Med 79:234–245, 2018. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.26670

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mcDESPOT determines the myelin water fraction and assesses white-matter myelination more directly than traditional diffusion-weighted imaging, but depends on acquisition protocol and modelling assumptions.

    “This method assesses white-matter myelination more directly than does traditional diffusion-weighted imaging, but is dependent on acquisition protocol and modelling assumptions5,233,5, 234.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [43]Lutti A, Weiskopf N. Optimizing the accuracy of T1 mapping accounting for RF non‐linearities and spoiling characteristics in FLASH imaging. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2013. p. 2478.
  2. [46]Deoni S. Transverse relaxation time (T2) mapping in the brain with offresonance correction using phase‐cycled steady‐state free precession imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 411– 417. 19629970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira, R. P. A. G., Malik, S. J., & Hajnal, J. V.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Teixeira, Rui Pedro A.G.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
234-245
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2596398870
Cited by
39
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L00531X/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
despots, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, Cramer-Rao lower bound, acquisition parameter optimization, magnetization transfer, B0 mapping, estimation precision, one-compartment model
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Calibration, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Phantoms, Imaging, Young Adult, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review