The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disorders
Abstract
Muscle ultrasound is a useful tool in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders, as these disorders result in muscle atrophy and intramuscular fibrosis and fatty infiltration, which can be visualized with ultrasound. Several prospective studies have reported high sensitivities and specificities in the detection of neuromuscular disorders. Although not investigated in large series of patients, different neuromuscular disorders tend to show specific changes on muscle ultrasound, which can be helpful in differential diagnosis. For example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy results in a severe, homogeneous increase of muscle echo intensity with normal muscle thickness, whereas spinal muscular atrophy shows an inhomogeneous increase of echo intensity with severe atrophy. A major advantage of muscle ultrasound, compared to other imaging techniques, is its ability to visualize muscle movements, such as muscle contractions and fasciculations. This study reviews the possibilities and limitations of ultrasound in muscle imaging and its value as a diagnostic tool in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., & Ross, R. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50216.x · Cited by 3,139
Skeletal muscle sonography: a correlative study of echogenicity and morphology
Reimers, K., Reimers, C. D., Wagner, S., Paetzke, I., & Pongratz, D. E. (1993) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.1993.12.2.73 · Cited by 385
Cited by
Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
Ashir, A., Jerban, S., Barrère, V., Wu, Y., Shah, S. B., Andre, M. P., & Chang, E. Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23104763 · Cited by 57
van den Noort, F., van der Vaart, C. H., Grob, A. T. M., van de Waarsenburg, M. K., Slump, C. H., & van Stralen, M. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20181 · Cited by 52
“UH dimensions 9,10 and mean echogenicity (MEP) 11–13 and global strain of the puborec-talis muscle (PRM) 14 provide information about PRM composition and function, and are therefore parameters of potential clinical relevance 15,16 .”
BackgroundVoermans, N. C., Kempers, M., Lammens, M., van Alfen, N., Janssen, M. C., Bönnemann, C., van Engelen, B. G., & Hamel, B. C. (2012) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.35232 · Cited by 36
Kitagawa, T., Nakamura, M., & Fukumoto, Y. (2023) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2023.112301 · Cited by 12
Zhou, M., Tang, A. S., Zhang, H., Xu, Z., Ke, A. M. C., Su, C., Huang, Y., Mantyh, W. G., Jaffee, M. S., Rankin, K. P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104820 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillen, S., Arts, I. M. P., & Zwarts, M. J.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-27
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 679-693
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W2132091723
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.