The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Processed nerve allografts offer a promising alternative to nerve autografts in the surgical management of peripheral nerve injuries where short deficits exist. Methods: Three established models of acellular nerve allograft (cold‐preserved, detergent‐processed, and AxoGen‐processed nerve allografts) were compared with nerve isografts and silicone nerve guidance conduits in a 14‐mm rat sciatic nerve defect. Results: All acellular nerve grafts were superior to silicone nerve conduits in support of nerve regeneration. Detergent‐processed allografts were similar to isografts at 6 weeks postoperatively, whereas AxoGen‐processed and cold‐preserved allografts supported significantly fewer regenerating nerve fibers. Measurement of muscle force confirmed that detergent‐processed allografts promoted isograft‐equivalent levels of motor recovery 16 weeks postoperatively. All acellular allografts promoted greater amounts of motor recovery compared with silicone conduits. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that differential processing for removal of cellular constituents in preparing acellular nerve allografts affects recovery in vivo. Muscle Nerve, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schenke-Layland, K., Vasilevski, O., Opitz, F., König, K., Riemann, I., Halbhuber, K. J., Wahlers, T., & Stock, U. A. (2003) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2003.08.002 · Cited by 302
Zuo, J., Ferguson, T. A., Hernandez, Y. J., Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., & Muir, D. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-14-05203.1998 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Biomaterials for the Development of Peripheral Nerve Guidance Conduits
Nectow, A. R., Marra, K. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0240 · Cited by 395
Hussain, G., Wang, J., Rasul, A., Anwar, H., Qasim, M., Zafar, S., Aziz, N., Razzaq, A., Hussain, R., de Aguilar, J.-L. G., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.35653 · Cited by 323
Modern Trends for Peripheral Nerve Repair and Regeneration: Beyond the Hollow Nerve Guidance Conduit
Carvalho, C. R., Oliveira, J. M., & Reis, R. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00337 · Cited by 297
Kim, J. K., Koh, Y.-D., Kim, J. O., & Seo, D. H. (2016) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.016 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, A. M., Macewan, M., Santosa, K. B., Chenard, K. E., Ray, W. Z., Hunter, D. A., Mackinnon, S. E., & Johnson, P. J.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-234
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W2018117162
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.22033
- The paper
- Moore, A. M., Macewan, M., Santosa, K. B., Chenard, K. E., Ray, W. Z., Hunter, D. A., Mackinnon, S. E., & Johnson, P. J. (2011). Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
