Cited by 60Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchUterine Myomas and Treatments

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for grading pelvic organ prolapse according to the international continence society classification: Which line should be used?

Fauconnier, Arnaud, Zareski, Elise, Abichedid, Joseph, Bader, Georges, Falissard, Bruno, Fritel, Xavier·2008·Neurourology and Urodynamics

Abstract

Aims: To assess and compare the reliability of dynamic MRI to quantify pelvic organ prolapse (POP) according to the International Continence Society (ICS) using two different reference lines, and to determine which line gives the best concordance with clinical examination. Methods: Forty‐seven patients with genital prolapse underwent physical examination and dynamic MRI. Five nulliparous, symptom‐free female volunteers underwent dynamic MRI as control subjects. Two distinct observers performed the MRI measurements of POP according to the ICS using two distinct reference lines: the mid‐pubic line and a new one, the perineal line that provides a better match with the hymen plane. Measurements were repeated twice according to each line. The intra‐class coefficient was used to estimate intra‐observer and inter‐observer reliability; the Altman and Bland plot was used to assess the agreement between MRI and clinical measurements. Results: The intra‐observer and inter‐observer reliability of MRI measurements were in general excellent. Intra‐class coefficients were better for the mid‐pubic line than the perineal line. Although the MRI measurements correlate significantly with the physical measurements, the Altman and Bland plot shows an unacceptable magnitude of discrepancy between clinical and MRI examinations. Conclusions: Although dynamic MRI shows excellent inter‐ and intra‐observer reliability, its agreement with clinical examination is poor whatever the line used. Neurourol. Urodynam. 27:191–197, 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nau.20491

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dynamic MRI has been used to assess prolapse through imaging, but studies suggest that when compared with physical examination there is good to moderate correlation only in the anterior compartment and imaging tends to overestimate the extent of the prolapse.

    “Dynamic MRI has been used to assess prolapse through imaging, but studies suggest that when compared with physical examination there is good to moderate correlation only in the anterior compartment and imaging tends to overestimate the extent of the prolapse [32, 33, 34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fauconnier, A., Zareski, E., Abichedid, J., Bader, G., Falissard, B., & Fritel, X.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Fauconnier, Arnaud
Venue
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
191-197
ISSN
  • 0733-2467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6777
OpenAlex
W2046569025
Cited by
60
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurourology and Urodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, dynamic MRI, reference lines, measurement reliability, observer agreement, clinical examination comparison
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Pelvis, Severity of Illness Index, Urinary Incontinence, Uterine Prolapse, Valsalva Maneuver, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review