Cited by 92Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Levator ani thickness variations in symptomatic and asymptomatic women using magnetic resonance-based 3-dimensional color mapping

Hoyte, Lennox, Jakab, Marianna, Warfield, Simon K., Shott, Susan, Flesh, George, Fielding, Julia R.·2004·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective This study was undertaken to develop and test a 3-dimensional (3D) color thickness mapping technique on levator ani imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods Supine MRI datasets from 30 women were studied: 10 asymptomatic, 10 with urodynamic stress incontinence, and 10 with pelvic organ prolapse. Levators were manually outlined, and thickness mapping applied. Three-dimensional models were colored topographically, reflecting levator thickness. Thickness and occurrences of absent levator substance (gaps) were compared across the 3 groups, using nonparametric statistical tests.Results Color thickness mapping was successful in all subjects. There were statistically significant differences in thickness and gap percentages among the 3 groups of women, with thicker, bulkier levators in asymptomatic women, compared with women with prolapse or urodynamic stress incontinence.Conclusion Color thickness mapping is feasible. It may be used to compare levators in symptomatic and asymptomatic women, to study relationships between levator thickness and pelvic floor dysfunction. This technique can be used in larger studies for hypothesis testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.067

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyte, L., Jakab, M., Warfield, S. K., Shott, S., Flesh, G., & Fielding, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Rush University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
191
Issue
3
Pages
856-861
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153062118
Cited by
92
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (P01 CA67165-06, P01CA067165)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013218)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
levator ani muscle, pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, 3D MRI reconstruction, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Color, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Floor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review