The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factor graph optimization for GNSS/INS integration: A comparison with the extended Kalman filter
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Factor graph optimization (FGO) recently has attracted attention as an alternative to the extended Kalman filter (EKF) for GNSS-INS integration. This study evaluates both loosely and tightly coupled integrations of GNSS code pseudorange and INS measurements for real-time positioning, using both conventional EKF and FGO with a dataset collected in an urban canyon in Hong Kong. The FGO strength is analyzed by degenerating the FGO-based estimator into an “EKF-like estimator.” In addition, the effects of window size on FGO performance are evaluated by considering both the GNSS pseudorange error models and environmental conditions. We conclude that the conventional FGO outperforms the EKF because of the following two factors: (1) FGO uses multiple iterations during the estimation to achieve a robust estimation; and (2) FGO better explores the time correlation between the measurements and states, based on a batch of historical data, when the measurements do not follow the Gaussian noise assumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System
Quigley, M. (2009) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · Cited by 8,729
New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems
Julier, S. J., & Uhlmann, J. K. (1997) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.280797 · Cited by 5,331
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669
The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation
Wan, E. A., & Van Der Merwe, R. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373) · doi:10.1109/asspcc.2000.882463 · Cited by 4,001
Survey of Nonlinear Attitude Estimation Methods
Crassidis, J. L., Markley, F. L., & Cheng, Y. (2007) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.22452 · Cited by 1,094
iSAM: Incremental Smoothing and Mapping
Kaess, M., Ranganathan, A., & Dellaert, F. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2008.2006706 · Cited by 1,076
(2015) · Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · Cited by 854
Barfoot, T. D. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316671528 · Cited by 724
Factor Graphs for Robot Perception
Dellaert, F., & Kaess, M. (2017) · Foundations and Trends in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000043 · Cited by 533
The iterated Kalman filter update as a Gauss-Newton method
Bell, B. M., & Cathey, F. W. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.250476 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, W., Pfeifer, T., Bai, X., & Hsu, L.
- Venue
- NAVIGATION
- Publisher
- Institute of Navigation
- Published
- 2021-05-22
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-331
- ISSN
- 0028-1522 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-4296
- OpenAlex
- W3164521861
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factor graph optimization for GNSS/INS integration: A comparison with the extended Kalman filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/navi.421
- The paper
- Wen, W., Pfeifer, T., Bai, X., & Hsu, L. (2021). Factor graph optimization for GNSS/INS integration: A comparison with the extended Kalman filter. NAVIGATION. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
