Cited by 1,076Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksInertial Sensor and Navigation

iSAM: Incremental Smoothing and Mapping

Open access
Kaess, M., Ranganathan, A., Dellaert, F.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

In this paper, we present incremental smoothing and mapping (iSAM), which is a novel approach to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem that is based on fast incremental matrix factorization. iSAM provides an efficient and exact solution by updating a QR factorization of the naturally sparse smoothing information matrix, thereby recalculating only those matrix entries that actually change. iSAM is efficient even for robot trajectories with many loops as it avoids unnecessary fill-in in the factor matrix by periodic variable reordering. Also, to enable data association in real time, we provide efficient algorithms to access the estimation uncertainties of interest based on the factored information matrix. We systematically evaluate the different components of iSAM as well as the overall algorithm using various simulated and real-world datasets for both landmark and pose-only settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2008.2006706

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaess, M., Ranganathan, A., & Dellaert, F.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2008-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1365-1378
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W2137052305
Cited by
1,076
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 53
FWCI
61.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0448111)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
ISAM, SLAM, QR decomposition, variable reordering, data association, estimation uncertainty, robot trajectory, loop closure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review