The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation
Abstract
This paper points out the flaws in using the extended Kalman filter (EKE) and introduces an improvement, the unscented Kalman filter (UKF), proposed by Julier and Uhlman (1997). A central and vital operation performed in the Kalman filter is the propagation of a Gaussian random variable (GRV) through the system dynamics. In the EKF the state distribution is approximated by a GRV, which is then propagated analytically through the first-order linearization of the nonlinear system. This can introduce large errors in the true posterior mean and covariance of the transformed GRV, which may lead to sub-optimal performance and sometimes divergence of the filter. The UKF addresses this problem by using a deterministic sampling approach. The state distribution is again approximated by a GRV, but is now represented using a minimal set of carefully chosen sample points. These sample points completely capture the true mean and covariance of the GRV, and when propagated through the true nonlinear system, captures the posterior mean and covariance accurately to the 3rd order (Taylor series expansion) for any nonlinearity. The EKF in contrast, only achieves first-order accuracy. Remarkably, the computational complexity of the UKF is the same order as that of the EKF. Julier and Uhlman demonstrated the substantial performance gains of the UKF in the context of state-estimation for nonlinear control. Machine learning problems were not considered. We extend the use of the UKF to a broader class of nonlinear estimation problems, including nonlinear system identification, training of neural networks, and dual estimation problems. In this paper, the algorithms are further developed and illustrated with a number of additional examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks
(2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221546 · Cited by 2,386
The square-root unscented Kalman filter for state and parameter-estimation
Van der Merwe, R., & Wan, E. A. (2002) · 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2001.940586 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationA Review of Data Fusion Techniques
Castanedo, F. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/704504 · Cited by 1,027
Xing, Y., He, W., Pecht, M., & Tsui, K. L. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.008 · Cited by 977
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey of Current Trends in Autonomous Driving
Bresson, G., Alsayed, Z., Yu, L., & Glaser, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2017.2749181 · Cited by 885
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, E. A., & Van Der Merwe, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Pages
- 153-158
- OpenAlex
- W1749494163
- Cited by
- 4,001
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/asspcc.2000.882463
- The paper
- Wan, E. A., & Van Der Merwe, R. (2002). The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium (Cat. No.00EX373). https://doi.org/10.1109/asspcc.2000.882463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.