Cited by 420Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Three‐dimensional characterization of non‐gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging

Lu, Hanzhang, Jensen, Jens H., Ramani, Anita, Helpern, Joseph A.·2006·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

Conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures water diffusion parameters based on the assumption that the spin displacement distribution is a Gaussian function. However, water movement in biological tissue is often non-Gaussian and this non-Gaussian behavior may contain useful information related to tissue structure and pathophysiology. Here we propose an approach to directly measure the non-Gaussian property of water diffusion, characterized by a four-dimensional matrix referred to as the diffusion kurtosis tensor. This approach does not require the complete measurement of the displacement distribution function and, therefore, is more time efficient compared with the q-space imaging technique. A theoretical framework of the DK calculation is established, and experimental results are presented for humans obtained within a clinically feasible time of about 10 min. The resulting kurtosis maps are shown to be robust and reproducible. Directionally-averaged apparent kurtosis coefficients (AKC, a unitless parameter) are 0.74 +/- 0.03, 1.09 +/- 0.01 and 0.84 +/- 0.02 for gray matter, white matter and thalamus, respectively. The three-dimensional kurtosis angular plots show tissue-specific geometry for different brain regions and demonstrate the potential of identifying multiple fiber structures in a single voxel. Diffusion kurtosis imaging is a useful method to study non-Gaussian diffusion behavior and can provide complementary information to that of DTI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.1020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, H., Jensen, J. H., Ramani, A., & Helpern, J. A.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Hanzhang
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
236-247
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W2063111834
Cited by
420
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
diffusion kurtosis imaging, non-Gaussian diffusion, q-space imaging, white matter, gray matter, thalamus
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Body Water, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Water, Normal Distribution, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review