Three‐dimensional characterization of non‐gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging
Abstract
Conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures water diffusion parameters based on the assumption that the spin displacement distribution is a Gaussian function. However, water movement in biological tissue is often non-Gaussian and this non-Gaussian behavior may contain useful information related to tissue structure and pathophysiology. Here we propose an approach to directly measure the non-Gaussian property of water diffusion, characterized by a four-dimensional matrix referred to as the diffusion kurtosis tensor. This approach does not require the complete measurement of the displacement distribution function and, therefore, is more time efficient compared with the q-space imaging technique. A theoretical framework of the DK calculation is established, and experimental results are presented for humans obtained within a clinically feasible time of about 10 min. The resulting kurtosis maps are shown to be robust and reproducible. Directionally-averaged apparent kurtosis coefficients (AKC, a unitless parameter) are 0.74 +/- 0.03, 1.09 +/- 0.01 and 0.84 +/- 0.02 for gray matter, white matter and thalamus, respectively. The three-dimensional kurtosis angular plots show tissue-specific geometry for different brain regions and demonstrate the potential of identifying multiple fiber structures in a single voxel. Diffusion kurtosis imaging is a useful method to study non-Gaussian diffusion behavior and can provide complementary information to that of DTI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-Gaussian diffusion is typically a consequence of barriers and compartments, and higher kurtosis values imply greater diffusional heterogeneity.
“Non-Gaussian diffusion is typically a consequence of barriers and compartments, and higher kurtosis values imply greater diffusional heterogeneity [12–14].”
From Brain microstructure abnormalities in the 3xTg-AD mouse – A diffusion MRI and morphology correlation study (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain
Pierpaoli, C., Jezzard, P., Basser, P. J., Barnett, A., & Di Chiro, G. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209 · Cited by 2,664 · see citing works
Tuch, D. S. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20279 · Cited by 1,880 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI
Jones, D. K., Knösche, T. R., & Turner, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging
Fieremans, E., Jensen, J. H., & Helpern, J. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Self-citationSANDI: a compartment‐based model for non‐invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI
Palombo, M., Ianus, A., Guerreri, M., Nunes, D., Alexander, D. C., Shemesh, N., & Zhang, H. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Jelescu, I. O., Veraart, J., Adisetiyo, V., Milla, S. S., Novikov, D. S., & Fieremans, E. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.009 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Kamagata, K., Zalesky, A., Hatano, T., Ueda, R., Di Biase, M. A., Okuzumi, A., Shimoji, K., Hori, M., Caeyenberghs, K., Pantelis, C., et al. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23628 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Falangola, M. F., Guilfoyle, D. N., Tabesh, A., Hui, E. S., Nie, X., Jensen, J. H., Gerum, S. V., Hu, C., LaFrancois, J., Collins, H. R., et al. (2014) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3140 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationFalangola, M. F., Nie, X., Ward, R., Dhiman, S., Voltin, J., Nietert, P. J., & Jensen, J. H. (2021) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2021.06.022 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Diffusion MRI detects early brain microstructure abnormalities in 2-month-old 3×Tg-AD mice
Falangola, M. F., Nie, X., Ward, R., McKinnon, E. T., Dhiman, S., Nietert, P. J., Helpern, J. A., & Jensen, J. H. (2020) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.4346 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationFalangola, M. F., Nie, X., Voltin, J., Ward, R., Dhiman, S., Nietert, P. J., & Jensen, J. H. (2022) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lu, H., Jensen, J. H., Ramani, A., & Helpern, J. A.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lu, Hanzhang
- Venue
- NMR in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-247
- ISSN
- 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1492
- OpenAlex
- W2063111834
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Keywords
- diffusion kurtosis imaging, non-Gaussian diffusion, q-space imaging, white matter, gray matter, thalamus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Body Water, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Water, Normal Distribution, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review