Cited by 16PARP inhibition in cancer therapyAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

PARP inhibitor rucaparib induces changes in NAD levels in cells and liver tissues as assessed by MRS

Open access
Almeida, Gilberto S., Bawn, Carlo M., Galler, Martin, Wilson, Ian, Thomas, Huw D., Kyle, Suzanne, Curtin, Nicola J., Newell, David R. +1 more·2017·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are multifunctional proteins which play a role in many cellular processes. Namely, PARP1 and PARP2 have been shown to be involved in DNA repair, and therefore are valid targets in cancer treatment with PARP inhibitors, such as rucaparib, currently in clinical trials. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H‐MRS) was used to study the impact of rucaparib in vitro and ex vivo in liver tissue from mice, via quantitative analysis of nicotinamide adenosine diphosphate (NAD+) spectra, to assess the potential of MRS as a biomarker of the PARP inhibitor response. SW620 (colorectal) and A2780 (ovarian) cancer cell lines, and PARP1 wild‐type (WT) and PARP1 knock‐out (KO) mice, were treated with rucaparib, temozolomide (methylating agent) or a combination of both drugs. 1 H‐MRS spectra were obtained from perchloric acid extracts of tumour cells and mouse liver. Both cell lines showed an increase in NAD+ levels following PARP inhibitor treatment in comparison with temozolomide treatment. Liver extracts from PARP1 WT mice showed a significant increase in NAD+ levels after rucaparib treatment compared with untreated mouse liver, and a significant decrease in NAD+ levels in the temozolomide‐treated group. The combination of rucaparib and temozolomide did not prevent the NAD+ depletion caused by temozolomide treatment. The 1 H‐MRS results show that NAD+ levels can be used as a biomarker of PARP inhibitor and methylating agent treatments, and suggest that in vivo measurement of NAD+ would be valuable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.3736

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almeida, G. S., Bawn, C. M., Galler, M., Wilson, I., Thomas, H. D., Kyle, S., Curtin, N. J., Newell, D. R., & Maxwell, R. J.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, Ross J.
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
30
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W2619778153
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Cancer Research UK, MRC and Department of Health (England) (C29821/A10348)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
rucaparib, PARP inhibitors, NAD levels, 1H NMR, PARP1, temozolomide, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, liver tissue, DNA repair, drug combination effects
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Animals, Humans, Indoles, Liver, NAD, Mice, Knockout, Cell Line, Tumor, Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review