Cited by 1,298PARP inhibition in cancer therapyDNA Repair MechanismsBiochemical and Molecular Research

PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond

Open access
Rouleau, Michèle, Patel, Anand, Hendzel, Michael J., Kaufmann, Scott H., Poirier, Guy G.·2010·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

Recent findings have thrust poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) into the limelight as potential chemotherapeutic targets. To provide a framework for understanding these recent observations, we review what is known about the structures and functions of the family of PARP enzymes, and then outline a series of questions that should be addressed to guide the rational development of PARP inhibitors as anticancer agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc2812

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among 17 PARPs, only PARP1, PARP2, PARP5a, and PARP5b can add multiple ADP-ribose units (PARylation).

    “Among the 17 PARPs, only four of them are capable of adding multiple ADP-ribose units (poly[ADP-ribosyl]ation) or PARylation; they are PARP1, PARP2, PARP5a (tankyrase 1), and PARP5b (tankyrase 2) (Leung, 2017; Rouleau et al., 2010).”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Rouleau et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rouleau, M., Patel, A., Hendzel, M. J., Kaufmann, S. H., & Poirier, G. G.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Poirier, Guy G.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2010-03-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
293-301
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2086038769
Cited by
1,298
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 116
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-74648, IG1-14052)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA136393)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM072474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Molecular Research
Keywords
PARP inhibitors, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, anticancer drug development, chemotherapeutic target, DNA repair
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1, Temozolomide, Gemcitabine, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Dacarbazine, Deoxycytidine, DNA Damage, DNA, Neoplasm, Humans, Kinetics, Neoplasms, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases, Substrate Specificity, Cell Death, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review