Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey of methods for encrypted traffic classification and analysis

Open access
Velan, Petr, Čermák, Milan, Čeleda, Pavel, Drašar, Martin·2015·International Journal of Network Management

Abstract

Summary: With the widespread use of encrypted data transport, network traffic encryption is becoming a standard nowadays. This presents a challenge for traffic measurement, especially for analysis and anomaly detection methods, which are dependent on the type of network traffic. In this paper, we survey existing approaches for classification and analysis of encrypted traffic. First, we describe the most widespread encryption protocols used throughout the Internet. We show that the initiation of an encrypted connection and the protocol structure give away much information for encrypted traffic classification and analysis. Then, we survey payload and feature‐based classification methods for encrypted traffic and categorize them using an established taxonomy. The advantage of some of described classification methods is the ability to recognize the encrypted application protocol in addition to the encryption protocol. Finally, we make a comprehensive comparison of the surveyed feature‐based classification methods and present their weaknesses and strengths. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nem.1901

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. ISO, 1994, ISO/IEC 7498‐1:1994 Information technology—Open Systems Interconnection—Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model
  2. MeyerC.20 Years of SSL/TLS Research. An Analysis of the Internet's Security Foundation.Ph.D. Thesis 2014.
  3. Stallings W, 2009, Protocol basics: Secure Shell protocol, The Internet Protocol Journal, 12, 18
  4. Blake‐WilsonS NystromM HopwoodD MikkelsenJ WrightT.Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions.Technical ReportRFC 4366 (Proposed Standard) Internet Engineering Task Force 2006 Obsoleted by RFCs 5246 6066 updated by RFC 5746. · doi:10.17487/rfc4366
  5. KochR RodosekGD.Command evaluation in encrypted remote sessions.InProceedings of the 2010 Fourth International Conference on Network and System Security NSS '10.IEEE Computer Society:Washington DC USA 2010;299–305. · doi:10.1109/nss.2010.62
  6. 10.1007/978-3-642-30633-4_11 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30633-4_11
  7. OkadaY AtaS NakamuraN NakahiraY OkaI.Application identification from encrypted traffic based on characteristic changes by encryption.In2011 IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability (CQR) Naples Florida USA 2011;1–6. · doi:10.1109/cqr.2011.5996087
  8. 10.1007/s11235-013-9690-5 · doi:10.1007/s11235-013-9690-5
  9. AmoliPV HamalainenT.A real time unsupervised NIDS for detecting unknown and encrypted network attacks in high speed network.In2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements and Networking Proceedings (M&N) Naples Italy 2013;149–154. · doi:10.1109/iwmn.2013.6663794
  10. CAIDA.Cyber‐security Research Ethics Dialog & Strategy Workshop 2013. Available from:http://www.caida.org/ workshops/creds/1305/[30 November 2014].
  11. IETF.IETF 88 Proceedings Technical Plenary 2014. Available from:http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/technical‐plenary.html[30 November 2014].

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Velan, P., Čermák, M., Čeleda, P., & Drašar, M.
Venue
International Journal of Network Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
355-374
ISSN
  • 1055-7148 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1190
OpenAlex
W2613715541
Cited by
377
References
50
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic (VF)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.