Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning-Powered Encrypted Network Traffic Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey

Shen, Meng, Ye, Ke, Liu, Xingtong, Zhu, Liehuang, Kang, Jiawen, Yu, Shui, Li, Qi, Xu, Ke·2023·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

Traffic analysis is the process of monitoring network activities, discovering specific patterns, and gleaning valuable information from network traffic. It can be applied in various fields such as network assert probing and anomaly detection. With the advent of network traffic encryption, however, traffic analysis becomes an arduous task. Due to the invisibility of packet payload, traditional traffic analysis methods relying on capturing valuable information from plaintext payload are likely to lose efficacy. Machine learning has been emerging as a powerful tool to extract informative features without getting access to payload, and thus is widely employed in encrypted traffic analysis. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on recent achievements in machine learning-powered encrypted traffic analysis. To begin with, we review the literature in this area and summarize the analysis goals that serve as the basis for literature classification. Then, we abstract the workflow of encrypted traffic analysis with machine learning tools, including traffic collection, traffic representation, traffic analysis method, and performance evaluation. For the surveyed studies, the requirements of classification granularity and information timeliness may vary a lot for different analysis goals. Hence, in terms of the goal of traffic analysis, we present a comprehensive review on existing studies according to four categories: network asset identification, network characterization, privacy leakage detection, and anomaly detection. Finally, we discuss the challenges and directions for future research on encrypted traffic analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2022.3208196

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 162 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1109/WoWMoM.2017.7974289 · doi:10.1109/wowmom.2017.7974289
  2. 2021, Multi-Site Connectivity (MSC) Capability Package V1 0
  3. 10.1145/3460120.3484547 · doi:10.1145/3460120.3484547
  4. 2018, The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1 3
  5. frankel, 2001, Demystifying the IPSec Puzzle
  6. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2843533 · DOI
  7. kemeny, 1976, Markov Chains With Stationary Transition Probabilities, 6
  8. hayes, 2016, k-fingerprinting: A robust scalable website fingerprinting technique, Proc Usenix Security Symp, 1187
  9. overdorf, 2017, How unique is your. Onion? An analysis of the fingerprintability of ToR onion services, Proc ACM SIGSAC Conf Comput Commun Security, 2021
  10. 10.1109/ICIN.2019.8685901 · doi:10.1109/icin.2019.8685901
  11. 10.1145/3007748.3007763 · doi:10.1145/3007748.3007763
  12. 10.1109/IWQoS49365.2020.9212897 · doi:10.1109/iwqos49365.2020.9212897
  13. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7036866 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7036866
  14. 10.1109/CIS.2015.105 · doi:10.1109/cis.2015.105
  15. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.007 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.007
  16. 10.1109/MASS.2018.00015 · doi:10.1109/mass.2018.00015
  17. 10.1109/NGMAST.2014.57 · doi:10.1109/ngmast.2014.57
  18. 10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8486211 · doi:10.1109/infocom.2018.8486211
  19. muehlstein, 2017, Analyzing https encrypted traffic to identify user’s operating system, browser and application, Proc 14th IEEE Annu Consum Commun Netw Conf (CCNC), 1
  20. 10.1109/CCNC.2016.7444941 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2016.7444941
  21. 10.1109/IWCMC48107.2020.9148110 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc48107.2020.9148110
  22. 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622243 · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622243
  23. merino, 2013, Instant Traffic Analysis with Tshark How-to
  24. 10.1007/s10207-016-0343-z · doi:10.1007/s10207-016-0343-z
  25. 10.1007/978-88-470-1818-1_22 · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-1818-1_22
  26. 10.1109/MMAR.2015.7284025 · doi:10.1109/mmar.2015.7284025
  27. oršoli?, 2018, In-network QoE and KPI monitoring of mobile YouTube traffic: Insights for encrypted IoS flows, Proc IEEE 14th Int Conf Netw Service Manag (CNSM), 233
  28. chappell, 2012, Wireshark Network Analysis
  29. 10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS51825.2021.9484509 · doi:10.1109/infocomwkshps51825.2021.9484509
  30. wang, 2017, Walkie–talkie: An efficient defense against passive website fingerprinting attacks, Proc USENIX Security Symp (USENIX Security), 1375
  31. 10.5220/0005099500210027 · doi:10.5220/0005099500210027
  32. 10.1109/IPCCC47392.2019.8958772 · doi:10.1109/ipccc47392.2019.8958772
  33. beznazwy, 2020, How China detects and blocks shadowsocks, Proc ACM Internet Meas Conf, 111
  34. 2021, P0f V3
  35. 2021, ZoomEye—Cyberspace Search Engine
  36. 10.1007/978-3-642-12334-4_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12334-4_17
  37. 2021, Shodan the search engine for
  38. 2021, FOFA
  39. 10.1109/CNSM.2013.6727845 · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2013.6727845
  40. 2022, Transparencyreport
  41. 2021, Cfssubseteval
  42. 2021, InfoGainAttributeEval
  43. 10.1109/PCCC.2007.358875 · doi:10.1109/pccc.2007.358875
  44. 10.1007/978-3-319-23126-6_25 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23126-6_25

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Shen, M., Ye, K., Liu, X., Zhu, L., Kang, J., Yu, S., Li, Q., & Xu, K.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2023
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
791-824
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W4296473472
Cited by
265
References
162
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1006101)
  • NSFC Projects (62222201, 62102099, 62132011, 61972039, 61932016)
  • Beijing Nova Program (Z201100006820006)
  • China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (61825204)
  • Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910003011)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning-Powered Encrypted Network Traffic Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2022.3208196
The paper
Shen, M., Ye, K., Liu, X., Zhu, L., Kang, J., Yu, S., Li, Q., & Xu, K. (2023). Machine Learning-Powered Encrypted Network Traffic Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3208196

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.