Exploring anomalous behaviour detection and classification for insider threat identification
Abstract
Summary: Recently, malicious insider threats represent one of the most damaging threats to companies and government agencies. Insider threat detection is a highly skewed data analysis problem, where the huge class imbalance makes the adaptation of learning algorithms to the real‐world context very difficult. This study proposes a new system for user‐centred machine learning‐based anomaly behaviour and insider threat detection on multiple data granularity levels. System evaluations and analysis are performed not only on individual data instances but also on normal and malicious users. Our results show that the proposed system, which is a combination of unsupervised anomaly detection and supervised machine learning methods, can learn from unlabelled data and a very small amount of labelled data. Furthermore, it can generalize to bigger datasets for detecting anomalous behaviours and unseen malicious insiders with a high detection and a low false‐positive rate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CERT dataset is the most widely used and easily available synthetic dataset for evaluating insider threat detection systems.
“The most widely used and easily available synthetic dataset for evaluating an insider threat detection system is the CERT dataset [18], which has been utilized in several insider threat detection studies such as [19], [20], [21], [22] and [23].”
From Enhancing Insider Threat Detection in Imbalanced Cybersecurity Settings Using the Density-Based Local Outlier Factor Algorithm (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332 · cited 2× · see citing works
“29,30 In this paper, we employed feed forward neural networks with up to three fully connected hidden layers, as well as rectified linear unit 31 and logistic as the activation functions for hidden layers and the output layer, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodBridging the Gap: A Pragmatic Approach to Generating Insider Threat Data
Glasser, J., & Lindauer, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops · doi:10.1109/spw.2013.37 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anomaly Detection for Insider Threats Using Unsupervised Ensembles
Le, D. C., & Zincir-Heywood, N. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3071928 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationInsider Threat Detection Using Machine Learning Approach
Bin Sarhan, B., & Altwaijry, N. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13010259 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
A new intelligent multilayer framework for insider threat detection
Al-Mhiqani, M. N., Ahmad, R., Abidin, Z. Z., Abdulkareem, K. H., Mohammed, M. A., Gupta, D., & Shankar, K. (2022) · Computers and Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107597 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Insider threat detection model using anomaly-based Isolation Forest algorithm
Al-Shehari, T., Al-Razgan, M., Alfakih, T., Alsowail, R. A., & Pandiaraj, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3326750 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Al-Shehari, T. A., Rosaci, D., Al-Razgan, M., Alfakih, T., Kadrie, M., Afzal, H., & Nawaz, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3373694 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“The most widely used and easily available synthetic dataset for evaluating an insider threat detection system is the CERT dataset [18], which has been utilized in several insider threat detection studies such as [19], [20], [21], [22], and [23].”
MethodExploring Adversarial Properties of Insider Threat Detection
Le, D. C., & Zincir-Heywood, N. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS) · doi:10.1109/cns48642.2020.9162254 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Le, D. C., & Zincir‐Heywood, N.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Faculty of Computer Science Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Corresponding author
- Le, Duc C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Network Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1055-7148 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1190
- OpenAlex
- W3014071235
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Network Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- insider threat detection, malicious insiders, anomaly detection, class imbalance, user behavior analysis, unsupervised learning, supervised learning, false positive reduction, user classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review