The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engraftment and differentiation of embryonic stem cell–derived neural progenitor cells in the cochlear nerve trunk: Growth of processes into the organ of corti
Open accessAbstract
Hearing loss in mammals is irreversible because cochlear neurons and hair cells do not regenerate. To determine whether we could replace neurons lost to primary neuronal degeneration, we injected EYFP-expressing embryonic stem cell-derived mouse neural progenitor cells into the cochlear nerve trunk in immunosuppressed animals 1 week after destroying the cochlear nerve (spiral ganglion) cells while leaving hair cells intact by ouabain application to the round window at the base of the cochlea in gerbils. At 3 days post transplantation, small grafts were seen that expressed endogenous EYFP and could be immunolabeled for neuron-specific markers. Twelve days after transplantation, the grafts had neurons that extended processes from the nerve core toward the denervated organ of Corti. By 64-98 days, the grafts had sent out abundant processes that occupied a significant portion of the space formerly occupied by the cochlear nerve. The neurites grew in fasciculating bundles projecting through Rosenthal's canal, the former site of spiral ganglion cells, into the osseous spiral lamina and ultimately into the organ of Corti, where they contacted hair cells. Neuronal counts showed a significant increase in neuronal processes near the sensory epithelium, compared to animals that were denervated without subsequent stem cell transplantation. The regeneration of these neurons shows that neurons differentiated from stem cells have the capacity to grow to a specific target in an animal model of neuronal degeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture
Ying, Q.-L., Stavridis, M., Griffiths, D., Li, M., & Smith, A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt780 · Cited by 1,504
Robust neural integration from retinal transplants in mice deficient in GFAP and vimentin
Kinouchi, R., Takeda, M., Yang, L., Wilhelmsson, U., Lundkvist, A., Pekny, M., & Chen, D. F. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1088 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors
Chen, W., Jongkamonwiwat, N., Abbas, L., Eshtan, S. J., Johnson, S. L., Kuhn, S., Milo, M., Thurlow, J. K., Andrews, P. W., Marcotti, W., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11415 · Cited by 388
The Potential of Amniotic Membrane/Amnion-Derived Cells for Regeneration of Various Tissues
Toda, A., Okabe, M., Yoshida, T., & Nikaido, T. (2007) · Journal of Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1254/jphs.cr0070034 · Cited by 386
Delivery of therapeutics to the inner ear: The challenge of the blood-labyrinth barrier
Nyberg, S., Abbott, N. J., Shi, X., Steyger, P. S., & Dabdoub, A. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0935 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Corrales, C. E., Pan, L., Li, H., Liberman, M. C., Heller, S., & Edge, A. S. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1489-1500
- ISSN
- 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4695
- OpenAlex
- W2020768773
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engraftment and differentiation of embryonic stem cell–derived neural progenitor cells in the cochlear nerve trunk: Growth of processes into the organ of corti. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/neu.20310
- The paper
- Corrales, C. E., Pan, L., Li, H., Liberman, M. C., Heller, S., & Edge, A. S. B. (2006). Engraftment and differentiation of embryonic stem cell–derived neural progenitor cells in the cochlear nerve trunk: Growth of processes into the organ of corti. Journal of Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.