CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Delphi Technique in ResearchMaternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for pernicious placenta previa in obstetrics: A Delphi study based across Chinese institutions

Open access
Zhang, Meng, Chen, Weiping, Liu, Cuiping, Sui, Jing, Wang, Dawei, Wang, Yan, Meng, Xin, Wang, Yiqian +1 more·2021·Nursing Open
DOI 10.1002/nop2.895PMC PMC8510706
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Aim: To identify a set of scientific, systematic and clinically applicable nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for pernicious placenta previa (PPP). Design: A modified Delphi‐Consensus Technique. Methods: According to literature retrieval published between 2009–2019, 38 nursing‐sensitive quality indicators were chosen and a questionnaire was designed. An online survey was conducted in 20 hospitals in China, and data of experts’ opinions were collected and analysed by improved Delphi method. Results: 38 nursing‐sensitive quality indicators were identified. The response rates in the two rounds of expert consultation were 97.4% and 100%, and the authoritative coefficients were 0.89 and 0.92. The coefficients of variation ranged from 0.04–0.28. The nursing‐sensitive quality indicators were successfully constructed based on the modified Delphi technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nop2.895

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Boatin, A. A., Schlotheuber, A., Betran, A. P., Moller, A. B., Barros, A. J. D., Boerma, T., Torloni, M. R., Victora, C. G., & Hosseinpoor, A. R. (2018). Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: Observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ Clinical Research, 360(k55), 1– 14. 10.1136/bmj.k55 PMC5782376 29367432 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chitkara, A., Siwatch, S., Bagga, R., Saha, S. C., & Singh, T. (2020). Cervical length monitoring in placenta previa to predict emergency cesarean section for antepartum hemorrhage. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135, 136S. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000664732.00043.b9 · DOI
  3. Chunxiu, Z., Xuemei, F., & Zhu, Z. (2018). Construction of nursing quality sensitive index of midwifery. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 24(8), 964– 967. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.08.025 · DOI
  4. De Rezende, H. A., Melleiro, M. M., & Shimoda, G. T. (2019). Interventions to reduce patient identification errors in the hospital setting: A systematic review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 17(1), 37– 42. 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003895 30629041 · DOI
  5. Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(12), 1743– 1748. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 3045356 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Donabedian, A. (1992). The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB – Quality Review Bulletin, 18(11), 356– 360. 10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30560-7 1465293 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gunn, V., Muntaner, C., Ng, E., Villeneuve, M., Gea‐Sanchez, M., & Chung, H. (2019). The influence of welfare state factors on nursing professionalization and nursing human resources: A time‐series cross‐sectional analysis, 2000–2015. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(11), 2797– 2810. 10.1111/jan.14155 31396994 · DOI
  8. Han, B., Chen, X., & Li, Q. (2018). Application of case mix index in the allocation of nursing human resources. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(6), 647– 652. 10.1111/jonm.12593 29473703 · DOI
  9. Heslop, L., Lu, S., & Xu, X. (2014). Nursing‐sensitive indicators: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(11), 2469– 2482. 10.1111/jan.12503 25113388 PMC4232854 · DOI
  10. Hicklin, K. T., Ivy, J. S., Wilson, J. R., Payton, F. C., Viswanathan, M., & Myers, E. R. (2019). Simulation model of the relationship between cesarean section rates and labor duration. Health Care Management Science, 22, 635– 657. 10.1007/s10729-018-9449-3 29995263 · DOI
  11. Isis, M. (2007). The national database of nursing quality indicators (NDNQI). Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(3), 1– 6. 10.3912/OJIN.Vol12No03Man02 21800926 · DOI
  12. Ju, Q. Y., Huang, L. H., Zhao, X. H., Xing, M. Y., Shao, L. W., Zhang, M. Y., & Shao, R. Y. (2018). Development of evidence‐based nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing: A Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(15), 3008– 3019. 10.1111/jocn.14256 29314311 · DOI
  13. Koch, D., Kutz, A., Conca, A., Wenke, J., Schuetz, P., & Mueller, B. (2020). The relevance, feasibility and benchmarking of nursing quality indicators: A Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(12), 3483– 3494. 10.1111/jan.14560 33009853 · DOI
  14. Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Development of a nursing‐sensitive quality indicator system based on the structure‐process‐outcome theory in orthopedic wards. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 34(23), 1766– 1771. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.23.002 · DOI
  15. Martinez, K., Battaglia, R., Start, R., Mastal, M. F., & Matlock, A. M. (2015). Nursing‐sensitive indicators in ambulatory care. Nursing Economic, 33(1), 59– 66. 26214940
  16. Mcintyre, D., Coyer, F., & Bonner, A. (2020). Identifying nurse sensitive indicators specific to haemodialysis nursing: A Delphi approach. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, 27(1), 75– 81. 10.1016/j.colegn.2019.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Radwan, A., Abdou, A. M., Kafy, S., Sheba, M., Allam, H., Bokhari, M., & Almutairi, M. (2018). Maternal outcome of cases of placenta previa with and without morbidly adherent placenta at King Abdul‐Aziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8(13), 1414– 1422. 10.4236/ojog.2018.813142 · DOI
  18. Ryu, J. M., Choi, Y. S., & Jin, Y. B. (2019). Bleeding control using intrauterine continuous running suture during cesarean section in pregnant women with placenta previa. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 299(1), 135– 139. 10.1007/s00404-018-4957-4 30386992 · DOI
  19. Shah, P. T., Saiyed, F. Z., Deliwala, K. J., & Dhameliya, P. (2020). Study of fetomaternal outcome in cases of placenta previa at tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9(8), 3326– 3329. 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20203317 · DOI
  20. Shiyu, Z., & Jiaohua, Y. (2019). Research progress on sensitivity index of quality of specialist care. Chinese Nursing Research, 33(8), 1342– 1346. 10.12102/j.jssn.1009-6493.2019.08.014 · DOI
  21. Xia, Z., Bin, Z., Jing, L., & Qingjuan, Z. (2016). Construction of nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for tertiary general hospitals. Journal of Nursing Science, 31(24), 4– 8. 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.24.004 · DOI
  22. Yang, S. U., Huang, L.‐H., Zhao, X.‐H., Xing, M.‐Y., Shao, L.‐W., Zhang, M.‐Y., Shao, R.‐Y., Wei, J.‐H., & Gao, C.‐H. (2019). Using the Delphi method to establish nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for ICU nursing in China. Research in Nursing & Health, 42(1), 48– 60. 10.1002/nur.21925 30681165 · DOI
  23. Yu, L., Hu, K., & Yang, H. (2016). A retrospective analysis on the pernicious placenta previa from 2008 to 2014. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 51(3), 169– 173. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.03.002 27030494 · DOI
  24. Yu, L., Su, C., & Wang, X. (2016). Multi‐centric clinical study of trial of labor after cesarean section. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 51(8), 581– 585. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.08.006 27561936 · DOI
  25. Zhang, J., Zhu, L., & Yang, G. (2018). Construction of a nursing quality indicator system for perioperative patients with degenerative cervical spondylopathy. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 24(21), 2507– 2511. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.21.006 · DOI
  26. Zhang, X., Department, O. & Hospital, J. P. (2019). Clinical application of psychological nursing combined with labor analgesia in reducing cesarean section rate of preeclampsia pregnant women. China Medicine & Pharmacy, 9(1), 114– 117.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, M., Chen, W., Liu, C., Sui, J., Wang, D., Wang, Y., Meng, X., Wang, Y., & Yue, C.
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
  • Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yue, Chongyu
ORCID
Venue
Nursing Open
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
3461-3468
ISSN
2054-1058 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1002/nop2.895
PMC
PMC8510706
OpenAlex
W3158737589
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nursing Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
pernicious placenta previa, nursing-sensitive quality indicators, obstetric nursing, quality of care, expert consensus, perinatal care
MeSH terms
China, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Obstetrics, Placenta Previa, Pregnancy, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review