Identifying nurse sensitive indicators specific to haemodialysis nursing: A Delphi approach
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among structural indicators, the nurse-patient ratio is the most basic and important indicator.
“Among the structural indicators, the most basic and important indicator is the nurse–patient ratio, which has been confirmed in the studies of McIntyre et al. (2019) and Gao et al. (2018).”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. (2019)
Section 5.1 identifies the nurse-to-patient ratio as a necessary structural indicator in haemodialysis nursing. It does not call it the most basic or most important; section 4.2 says most structural indicators were rated important or highly important, without ranking the ratio above them. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudies by McIntyre et al. (20) in Canada and Gao et al. (21) in China have verified the negative correlation between the nurse-to-patient ratio and the incidence of adverse events in hemodialysis patients.
“Additionally, studies by McIntyre et al. (20) in Canada and Gao et al. (21) in China have also verified the negative correlation between the nurse-to-patient ratio and the incidence of adverse events in hemodialysis patients.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. [20]
Section 5.3 says a low nurse-to-patient ratio could increase dialysis complications and reports a US study linking fewer nurses to more adverse events. But McIntyre et al. did not verify that correlation: Sections 3.2 and 4.1 describe an Australian Delphi panel, not a Canadian patient-outcomes study. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInadequate nurse staffing will directly lead to an excessive number of patients per nurse, which in turn reduces the standardization of vascular access assessment and maintenance procedures, and elevates the risk of adverse events such as unplanned extubation and catheter-related infections.
“Inadequate nurse staffing will directly lead to an excessive number of patients per nurse, which in turn reduces the standardization of vascular access assessment and maintenance procedures, and elevates the risk of adverse events such as unplanned extubation and catheter-related infections.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. [20]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAmong the 26 hemodialysis nursing quality indicators developed by McIntyre et al., only 5 items are related to vascular access.
“Among the 26 hemodialysis nursing quality indicators developed by McIntyre et al. (20), only 5 items are related to vascular access, and the 11 indicators identified by Gao et al. (21) include only 3 items related to vascular access, without dimension-specific categorization.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The Discussion reports consensus on 26 haemodialysis nurse-sensitive indicators. But Table 2 lists at least seven related to vascular access: vascular access nurse support, vascular access assessments, referrals for access concerns, extravasation, failed cannulation, needle dislodgement, and infected vascular access. It does not support the claim that only five are related to vascular access; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting studies focus primarily on the construction of general hemodialysis nursing quality indicators, with only a few items related to vascular access.
“Existing studies focus primarily on the construction of general hemodialysis nursing quality indicators, with only a few items related to vascular access, and the constructed indicators do not fully encompass the three dimensions of structure–process–outcome.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The Literature review says that only one earlier study had developed haemodialysis nurse-sensitive indicators, and §5.2 says that study identified no process indicators, supporting the concern about incomplete structure–process–outcome coverage in prior work. But §5.3 lists several vascular-access-related indicators shared with that earlier study; the paper does not establish that existing studies had only a few such items or focused primarily on general indicators. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
McIntyre et al. constructed 26 sensitive indicators of haemodialysis nursing quality through four rounds of Delphi expert consultation, including four structural, eight process, and 14 outcome indicators.
“David (McIntyre et al., 2019) et al. constructed 26 sensitive indicators of haemodialysis nursing quality through four rounds of Delphi expert letter consultation, including four structural indicators, eight process indicators and 14 outcome indicators.”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al., 2019
The three process indicators in this study were different from the eight process indicators in McIntyre et al. (2019).
“The three process indicators in this study were different from the eight process indicators in McIntyre et al. (2019), which may be related to different national conditions and different care concerns of haemodialysis centres.”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. (2019)
The difference between this study's process indicators and McIntyre et al. (2019) may be related to different national conditions and different care concerns of haemodialysis centres.
“The three process indicators in this study were different from the eight process indicators in McIntyre et al. (2019), which may be related to different national conditions and different care concerns of haemodialysis centres.”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. (2019)
In haemodialysis units, the ratio of nurses to patients can affect patient prognosis; fewer nurses directly affects treatment compliance, resulting in increased hospitalization and mortality.
“In haemodialysis units, the ratio of nurses to patients can affect the prognosis of patients, and having fewer nurses directly affects the treatment compliance of patients, resulting in an increased hospitalization rate and mortality rate.”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as McIntyre et al. (2019)
The constructed indicators in existing studies do not fully encompass the three dimensions of structure-process-outcome.
“Existing studies focus primarily on the construction of general hemodialysis nursing quality indicators, with only a few items related to vascular access, and the constructed indicators do not fully encompass the three dimensions of structure–process–outcome.”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Outcome Measurement in Nursing: Imperatives, Ideals, History, and Challenges
Jones, T. (2016) · OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing · doi:10.3912/ojin.vol21no02man01 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Construction of nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis using Delphi method
Gao, J., Liu, X., Che, W., & Xin, X. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14607 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Agar, J. W., Macgregor, M. S., & Blagg, C. R. (2007). Chronic maintenance hemodialysis: Making sense of the terminology. Hemodialysis International, 11(2), 252-262.
- Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Bruyneel, L., Van den Heede, K., Griffiths, P., Busse, R., et al. (2014). Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: A retrospective observational study. Lancet, 383(9931), 1824-1830.
- Akhu-Zaheya, L., Al-Maaitah, R., & Bany Hani, S. (2018). Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(3-4), e578-e589.
- Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305-321.
- Bennett, P., Bonner, A., & Moynahan, L. (2013). Ultrafiltration rate is a poor indicator of haemodialysis nursing quality. Commentary on Lindberg and Ludvigsen (2012). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(1), 137-139.
- Blair, W., & Smith, B. (2012). Nursing documentation: Frameworks and barriers. Contemporary Nurse, 41(2), 160-168.
- Blegen, M. A., Goode, C. J., Park, S. H., Vaughn, T., & Spetz, J. (2013). Baccalaureate education in nursing and patient outcomes. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(2), 89-94.
- Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal, 328(7451), 1312-1315.
- Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 2-6.
- Burston, S., Chaboyer, W., & Gillespie, B. (2014). Nurse-sensitive indicators suitable to reflect nursing care quality: A review and discussion of issues. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(13/14), 1785-1795.
- Cho, E., Sloane, D. M., Kim, E.-Y., Kim, S., Choi, M., Yoo, I. Y., et al. (2015). Effects of nurse staffing, work environments, and education on patient mortality: An observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(2), 535-542.
- Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(12), 1743-1748.
- Gargon, E., Crew, R., Burnside, G., & Williamson, P. R. (2019). Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 108, 110-120.
- Heslop, L., & Lu, S. (2014). Nursing-sensitive indicators: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(11), 2469-2482, 2414 p
- Johnson, L. A. (2014). Putting evidence into practice. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18.
- Kaminski, M. R., Raspovic, A., McMahon, L. P., Lambert, K. A., Erbas, B., Mount, P. F., et al. (2017). Factors associated with foot ulceration and amputation in adults on dialysis: A cross-sectional observational study. BMC Nephrology, 18(1), 293.
- Kessler, M., Moureau, F., & Nguyen, P. (2015). Anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis: Progress toward an optimal approach. Seminars in Dialysis, 28(5), 474-489.
- Kobayashi, H., Takemura, Y., & Kanda, K. (2011). Patient perception of nursing service quality; an applied model of Donabedian's structure-process-outcome approach theory. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 25(3), 419-425.
- Koch, T. (1992). A review of nursing quality assurance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(7), 785-794.
- Lindberg, M., & Ludvigsen, M. S. (2012). Ultrafiltration rate as a nursing-sensitive quality indicator in haemodialysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(10), 1320-1324.
- Mastal, M. (2016). Ambulatory care nurse-sensitive indicators series: Capturing the role of nursing in ambulatory care -the case for meaningful nurse-sensitive measurement. Nursing Economic$, 34(2), 92-76.
- Martinez-Smith, Y., Meek, C., & Tranter, S. (2016). The impact of a dedicated renal vascular access nurse on haemodialysis access outcomes. Journal of Vascular Access Devices, 2(1), 1-10.
- Montalvo, I. (2007). The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(3), 13p-13p.
- Ndoro, S. (2014). Effective multidisciplinary working: The key to high-quality care. The British Journal of Nursing, 23(13), 724-727.
- Paracuelles, V. C., Hodge, M. L., Craig, M., Don, B. R., Wilson, M. D., Ingram, K., et al. (2015). Clinical consult. Simplifying dialysis dose measurement in the hospital setting: Kt/V Ionic Dialysance (ID) versus Kt/Vurea. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 42(2), 187-189.
- Prezerakos, P., Galanis, P., & Moisoglou, I. (2015). The work environment of haemodialysis nurses and its impact on patients' outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(2), 132-140.
- Saran, R., Bragg-Gresham, J. L., Rayner, H. C., Goodkin, D. A., Keen, M. L., Van Dijk, P. C., Kurokawa, K., Piera, L., Saito, A., Fukuhara, S., & Young, E. W. (2003). Nonadherence in hemodialysis: associations with mortality, hospitalization, and practice patterns in the DOPPS. Kidney International, 64(1), 254-262.
- Thomas-Hawkins, C., Latham, C. E., & Hain, D. J. (2017). Emphasizing the value of nephrology nursing through nursing-sensitive indicators: A call for action. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 44(4), 317.
- Vernon, W. (2009). The Delphi technique: A review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(2), 69-76.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Li, Q., & He, L. (2023) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.1349 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., He, L., Tang, S., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Shi, M., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1858484
“Additionally, studies by McIntyre et al. (20) in Canada and Gao et al. (21) in China have also verified the negative correlation between the nurse-to-patient ratio and the incidence of adverse events in hemodialysis patients.”
Tang, S., Li, Q., Liu, L., He, L., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/8833031
- Authors
- McIntyre, D., Coyer, F., & Bonner, A.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- McIntyre, David
- Venue
- Collegian
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-81
- ISSN
- 1322-7696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2985194959
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Keywords
- nurse-sensitive indicators, nursing care quality, quality indicators, expert consensus, hemodialysis, nephrology nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review