The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence
Abstract
Using a grounded formal theory approach, 13 qualitative research reports were analyzed with the goal of synthesizing a middle‐range theory of women's responses to violent relationships. The combined sample numbered 282 ethnically and geographically diverse women ages 16–67. Within cultural contexts that normalized relationship violence while promoting idealized romance, these women dealt with the incongruity of violence in their relationships as a basic process of enduring love. In response to shifting definitions of their relationship situations, many women moved through four phases, which began with discounting early violence for the sake of their romantic commitment (“This is what I wanted”), progressed to immobilization and demoralization in the face of increasingly unpredictable violence that was endured by the careful monitoring of partner behavior and the stifling of self (“The more I do, the worse I am”), shifted to a perspective that redefined the situation as unacceptable (“I had enough”), and finally moved out of the relationship and toward a new life (“I was finding me”). Variations in the manifestation and duration of these phases were found to be linked to personal, sociopolitical, and cultural contexts. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 24:270–282, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Counteracting abuse and breaking free: The process of leaving revealed through women's voices
Merritt‐Gray, M., & Wuest, J. (1995) · Health Care for Women International · doi:10.1080/07399339509516194 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 · Cited by 3,569
“The initial items for inclusion in the preliminary “Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) Statement” were generated inductively from guides to synthesising qualitative health research [1,10], seminal methodology papers [4,11,12,22-24] and the authors’ experience in conducti…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSynthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581960501000110 · Cited by 2,132
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001 · Cited by 913
Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6 · Cited by 808
Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304269888 · Cited by 749
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kearney, M. H.
- Venue
- Research in Nursing & Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 270-282
- ISSN
- 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-240X
- OpenAlex
- W1977195843
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nur.1029
- The paper
- Kearney, M. H. (2001). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.