Cited by 194Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

Counteracting abuse and breaking free: The process of leaving revealed through women's voices

Merritt‐Gray, Marilyn, Wuest, Judith·1995·Health Care for Women International

Abstract

In a feminist, grounded-theory study, we interviewed rural survivors of abusive relationships to discover a substantive theory to explain the process of leaving. The central process for survivors was reclaiming self. In this article, we discuss the initial stages of reclaiming self: counteracting abuse and breaking free. Our findings reveal that the abused women were not passive victims. From the beginning, they counteracted abuse by relinquishing parts of self, minimizing abuse, and fortifying their defenses. The work of counteracting abuse prepared the survivor for testing the exits in the process of breaking free. These findings support the view of abused women as survivors and clearly demonstrate the societal infrastructure required to support women's efforts to counteract abuse until they have acquired the strength and resources to leave. In addition, questions are raised about the roles of lay and professional helpers in facilitating and inhibiting the process of reclaiming self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07399339509516194

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merritt‐Gray, M., & Wuest, J.
Affiliations
University of New Brunswick (CA)
Venue
Health Care for Women International
Published
1995-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
399-412
ISSN
  • 0739-9332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4665
OpenAlex
W2013401320
Cited by
194
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Care For Women International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, leaving abusive relationships, women survivors, abuse survivors, rural women, defensive coping, survivor support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Models, Psychological, Rural Population, Self Concept, Spouse Abuse, Nursing Methodology Research, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review