The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interventions to reduce the burden of caregiving for an adult with dementia: A meta‐analysis§
Abstract
Because of conflicting results, in order to clarify the state of the science it was necessary to do a systematic analysis of the literature on research testing the effect of interventions on the burden of persons caring for family members with dementia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using meta‐analytic techniques, those intervention strategies (support group, education, psychoeducation, counseling, respite care, and multicomponent) designed to help caregivers cope with the burden of caregiving. Using meta‐analytic methods developed by Glass, McGraw, and Smith (1981) and Hedges and Olkin (1985), 24 published research reports testing 27 treatments for caregivers of adults with dementia were synthesized. Overall, the analysis showed that collectively the interventions had no effect on caregiver burden. Only the category of multicomponent interventions significantly reduced caregiver burden. Burden may be too global an outcome to be affected consistently by intervention. Better and more precise measures are needed to evaluate the effects of caregiver interventions properly. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 24:349–360, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · Cited by 5,870
Caregiver Weil-Being: A Multidimensional Examination of Family Caregivers of Demented Adults
George, L. K., & Gwyther, L. P. (1986) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/26.3.253 · Cited by 1,393
Evans, D. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036 · Cited by 1,226
Families Caring for Elders in Residence: Issues in the Measurement of Burden
Poulshock, S. W., & Deimling, G. T. (1984) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/39.2.230 · Cited by 582
Dementia and the family: A stress management approach
Zarit, S. H., & Zarit, J. M. (1986) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e578772009-007 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: A review of the literature
Etters, L., Goodall, D., & Harrison, B. E. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00342.x · Cited by 1,112
Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2006) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610206003462 · Cited by 827
“Previous meta-analyses reported inconsistent findings as to whether the study quality does (Acton and Kang, 2001) or does not (Brodaty et al., 2003) influence intervention effects.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving
Gilhooly, K. J., Gilhooly, M. L. M., Sullivan, M. P., McIntyre, A., Wilson, L., Harding, E., Woodbridge, R., & Crutch, S. (2016) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8 · Cited by 410
Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications
Sörensen, S., Duberstein, P., Gill, D., & Pinquart, M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70599-3 · Cited by 396
Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia
Thompson, C. A., Spilsbury, K., Hall, J., Birks, Y., Barnes, C., & Adamson, J. (2007) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2318-7-18 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Acton, G. J., & Kang, J.
- Venue
- Research in Nursing & Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 349-360
- ISSN
- 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-240X
- OpenAlex
- W2035868540
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 28.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
