Cited by 374Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia

Open access
Thompson, Carl A, Spilsbury, Karen, Hall, Jill, Birks, Yvonne, Barnes, Colin, Adamson, Joy·2007·BMC Geriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia is an important health and social care problem and is one of the main causes of disability in later life. The number of families affected by dementia will dramatically increase over the next five decades. Despite the implications for health and social care services in the future, the overwhelming majority of care for people with dementia takes place away from health care settings. Providing informal care for someone with dementia can be psychologically, physically and financially expensive and a range of health service interventions aimed at supporting and providing information to these carers has developed to help carers meet these demands. This review examines whether information and support interventions improve the quality of life of people caring for someone with dementia. METHODS: A systematic review examining evidence from randomised controlled trials in which technology, individualised or group-based interventions built around the provision of support and/or information were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-four studies were included in the review. Controlling for the quality of the evidence, we found statistically significant evidence that group-based supportive interventions impact positively on psychological morbidity. However, whilst the improvement was unlikely to be due to chance, the clinical significance of this finding should be interpreted tentatively, due to the difficulties in interpreting the standardised mean difference as a measure of effect and the complex aetiology of depression. No evidence was found for the effectiveness of any other form of intervention on a range of physical and psychological health outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is little evidence that interventions aimed at supporting and/or providing information to carers of people with dementia are uniformly effective. There is a pressing need to ensure that supportive interventions at the development stage are accompanied by good quality randomised evaluations in which outcomes that are important to clinicians and carers are measured.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2318-7-18

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Connell CM Janevic MR Hudson ML Effects of a telephone-based exercise program for female spouse caregivers of dementia patients Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Stockholm, Sweden July 20–25 2002; [Abstract No 1996]
  2. Mittelman MS Counseling education and support for family caregivers of dementia patients: The similarities and differences between two effective psychosocial interventions and plans for a multinational collaborative study Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Psychogeriatric Association Vancouver, Canada Aug 15–20 1999; [Abstract no. 33]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, C. A., Spilsbury, K., Hall, J., Birks, Y., Barnes, C., & Adamson, J.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Barnes, Colin
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2007-07-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010367297
Cited by
374
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia, informal caregivers, caregiver support interventions, information interventions, group intervention, caregiver quality of life, psychological morbidity, depression, caregiver burden, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Dementia, United Kingdom, Humans, Respite Care, Social Support, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review