Cited by 103Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Improving outcomes of nursing home interactions

Williams, Kristine Nordlie·2006·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

In this study, an intervention designed to improve staff-resident communication was evaluated in three nursing homes. Audio recordings of staff speech from baseline, and immediately and 2 months post-intervention, were compared on elderspeak (infantilizing speech) and rated for care, respect, and control. After the intervention, staff used less elderspeak (i.e., diminutives, collective pronoun substitutions, shortened statements, and simplistic vocabulary). Immediate post-intervention conversations were rated as less controlling, but more respectful and caring. After 2 months, communication was more controlling, less respectful, and less caring. Reduction in staff elderspeak use continued for psycholinguistic measures, but improvements in care, respect, and control decayed, suggesting the need for ongoing reinforcement of training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.20117

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elderspeak is commonly used by nursing staff while providing care to older adults in long-term care settings, especially to older adults with dementia.

    “Elderspeak (infantilizing communication) is commonly used by nursing staff while providing care to older adults in long term care (LTC) settings, especially to older adults with dementia.1, 2, 3”
  • Elderspeak communication use by general nursing home staff has been significantly reduced by a brief intervention.

    “Elderspeak communication use by general nursing home staff has been significantly reduced by a brief intervention that should be tested in dementia care settings.2, 3”
  • Because elderspeak communication is widely used by nursing staff in residential long term care settings, reduction in its use may decrease problematic RTC behaviors.

    “Because elderspeak communication is widely used by nursing staff in residential long term care settings, reduction in its use may decrease problematic RTC behaviors. 2, 3”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, K. N.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Kristine Nordlie
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
121-133
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W1976577231
Cited by
103
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
nursing homes, elderspeak, intervention evaluation, employee training, long-term care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Communication, Dementia, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Middle Aged, Nonverbal Communication, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Homes, Nursing Staff, Psycholinguistics, Tape Recording, Midwestern United States, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review