The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of the 4‐item perceived stress scale among pregnant women: Results from the OTIS antidepressants study
Abstract
We aimed to estimate the reliability of the 4‐item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and its validity in predicting maternal depression and quality of life (QoL). Data regarding stress, depression and QoL were collected during pregnancy among a sub‐sample from the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists Antidepressants in Pregnancy Cohort. The 4‐item PSS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = .79), alternate forms stability reliability with the 10‐item PSS (Pearson correlation coefficient r = .63; p < .001), convergent validity with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (r = .67; p < .001), and concurrent validity with the mental health component of the Short‐Form‐12 (r = −.62; p < .001) as a measure of QoL. The 4‐item PSS is a valid and useful tool for assessing maternal stress during pregnancy. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 35:363–375, 2012
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
Hammen, C. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938 · Cited by 2,979
Cross-Validation of Item Selection and Scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in Nine Countries
Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J. B., Brazier, J. E., Bullinger, M., Kaasa, S., Leplege, A., Prieto, L., et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00109-7 · Cited by 2,907
Antenatal maternal stress and long‐term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why?
Talge, N. M., Neal, C., Glover, V., & the Early Stress, T. R. A. P. S. N. F. A. N. E. O. C. A. A. M. H. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01714.x · Cited by 1,349
Screening for depression during pregnancy with the edinburgh depression scale (EDDS)
Murray, D., & Cox, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646839008403615 · Cited by 973
Wadhwa, P. D., Sandman, C. A., Porto, M., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Garite, T. J. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90016-c · Cited by 794
Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., & Gardner, C. O. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1243 · Cited by 721
Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Greece
Andreou, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Lionis, C., Varvogli, L., Gnardellis, C., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8083287 · Cited by 641
Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes.
Lobel, M., Cannella, D. L., Graham, J. E., DeVincent, C., Schneider, J., & Meyer, B. A. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013242 · Cited by 587
Cited by
Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale
Lee, E.-H. (2012) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004 · Cited by 2,305
Vallejo, M. A., Vallejo-Slocker, L., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Mañanes, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00037 · Cited by 286
Bauer, C. C. C., Caballero, C., Scherer, E., West, M. R., Mrazek, M. D., Phillips, D. T., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2019) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000337 · Cited by 85
Kakoschke, N., Hassed, C., Chambers, R., & Lee, K. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258999 · Cited by 51
Strid, C., Andersson, C., Forsell, Y., Öjehagen, A., & Lundh, L. (2016) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12111 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Karam, F., Bérard, A., Sheehy, O., Huneau, M., Briggs, G., Chambers, C., Einarson, A., Johnson, D., Kao, K., Koren, G., Martin, B., Polifka, J. E., Riordan, S. H., Roth, M., Lavigne, S. V., Wolfe, L., & the OTIS Research Committee
- Venue
- Research in Nursing & Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-17
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-375
- ISSN
- 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-240X
- OpenAlex
- W2111026825
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and validity of the 4‐item perceived stress scale among pregnant women: Results from the OTIS antidepressants study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nur.21482
- The paper
- Karam, F., Bérard, A., Sheehy, O., Huneau, M., Briggs, G., Chambers, C., Einarson, A., Johnson, D., Kao, K., Koren, G., Martin, B., Polifka, J. E., Riordan, S. H., Roth, M., Lavigne, S. V., Wolfe, L., & the OTIS Research Committee. (2012). Reliability and validity of the 4‐item perceived stress scale among pregnant women: Results from the OTIS antidepressants study. Research in Nursing & Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
