Cited by 33Chronic Disease Management StrategiesNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationMachine Learning in Healthcare

Characterizing shared and distinct symptom clusters in common chronic conditions through natural language processing of nursing notes

Open access
Koleck, Theresa A., Topaz, Maxim, Tatonetti, Nicholas P., George, Maureen, Miaskowski, Christine, Smaldone, Arlene, Bakken, Suzanne·2021·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

Data-driven characterization of symptom clusters in chronic conditions is essential for shared cluster detection and physiological mechanism discovery. This study aims to computationally describe symptom documentation from electronic nursing notes and compare symptom clusters among patients diagnosed with four chronic conditions-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancer. Nursing notes (N = 504,395; 133,977 patients) were obtained for the 2016 calendar year from a single medical center. We used NimbleMiner, a natural language processing application, to identify the presence of 56 symptoms. We calculated symptom documentation prevalence by note and patient for the corpus. Then, we visually compared documentation for a subset of patients (N = 22,657) diagnosed with COPD (n = 3339), heart failure (n = 6587), diabetes (n = 12,139), and cancer (n = 7269) and conducted multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering to discover underlying groups of patients who have similar symptom profiles (i.e., symptom clusters) for each condition. As expected, pain was the most frequently documented symptom. All conditions had a group of patients characterized by no symptoms. Shared clusters included cardiovascular symptoms for heart failure and diabetes; pain and other symptoms for COPD, diabetes, and cancer; and a newly-identified cognitive and neurological symptom cluster for heart failure, diabetes, and cancer. Cancer (gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue) and COPD (mental health symptoms) each contained a unique cluster. In summary, we report both shared and distinct, as well as established and novel, symptom clusters across chronic conditions. Findings support the use of electronic health record-derived notes and NLP methods to study symptoms and symptom clusters to advance symptom science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.22190

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koleck, T. A., Topaz, M., Tatonetti, N. P., George, M., Miaskowski, C., Smaldone, A., & Bakken, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • School of Nursing Columbia University New York New York USA
Corresponding author
Koleck, Theresa A.
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-12
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
906-919
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W3207574080
Cited by
33
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (K99NR017651, P30NR016587, R00NR017651)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
symptom clusters, chronic disease, nursing notes, electronic health records, natural language processing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, cancer, pain, cardiovascular symptoms, fatigue, symptom documentation
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Heart Failure, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Neoplasms, Cluster Analysis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Electronic Health Records, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review