Cited by 17Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringCommunity Development and Social ImpactBlood donation and transfusion practices

Fundraising or promoting philanthropy? A Qualitative study of the Massachusetts Catalogue for Philanthropy

Open access
Eikenberry, Angela M.·2005·International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing

Abstract

Philanthropic institutions are increasingly involved in efforts to promote or expand philanthropy in the US, yet little research has been done in relation to such efforts within the “new philanthropy” environment. This qualitative study examines one such effort: the Massachusetts Catalogue for Philanthropy. The study focuses on understanding what key individuals associated with the Catalogue think about its purpose(s) as a means of beginning to answer the underlying questions: How are these new philanthropy promotion projects different from traditional fundraising and to what degree are they contributing to a new philanthropic paradigm? Results and data analysis indicate that participants have varying opinions about the purpose of the Catalogue that come from two perspectives. One sees the Catalogue as a tool for institutional fundraising for small charities featured by the Catalogue in the annually published Catalogue for Philanthropy; the other sees the Catalogue as a mechanism for the overall promotion of philanthropy in the state by educating donors, creating a new conceptualization of philanthropy, and strengthening philanthropy. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nvsm.8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • U.S. philanthropic institutions have found it increasingly difficult to raise needed funds from givers.

    “Charitable organizations in the U.S. have found it increasingly difficult to raise funds from donors.”

    From How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity (2011) · cites this paper as Eikenberry, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eikenberry, A. M.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Eikenberry, Angela M.
Venue
International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
137-149
ISSN
  • 1465-4520 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-103X
OpenAlex
W1969376920
Cited by
17
References
19
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
new philanthropy, fundraising, small charities, donor education, charitable institutions, nonprofit marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review