Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Morphometrical Analysis on Cut Marks Using a 3D Digital Microscope

Boschin, F., Crezzini, J.·2012·International Journal of Osteoarchaeology

Abstract

Microscopic analysis represents a powerful tool for understanding taphonomy. Our work, as in other studies, aims to identify the origin of different kinds of marks on bones. In this paper, we test the application of a HIROX Digital Microscope KH‐7700. This microscope captures 3D images of the bone surface, thus bringing into focus the whole section of striations. This enables the direct observation of their shape from several points of view and the relatively rapid procurement of a variety of measurements (e.g. depth, breadth, angles). This technology has been applied to several butchery experiments, in which both stone and metal tools have been used to produce cut marks on skeletal elements. The morphometrical parameters presented in this paper enabled the correct identification of the different origins of experimental striations and were further tested on two archaeological sets of cut marks inflicted by both metal blades and flint flakes or tools. Therefore, the obtained experimental records constitute a useful database for archaeological remains. The morphometrical parameters developed and implemented in this study represent objective criteria for identifying the origin of cut marks which can be processed through statistical analysis. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oa.1272

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Alberti D, 2009, L'Età del Ferro a San Sepolcro. Attività produttive e ambiente nel sito di Trebbio, 27
  2. Alberti D, 2009, L'Età del Ferro a San Sepolcro. Attività produttive e ambiente nel sito di Trebbio, 13
  3. Andrews P, 1990, Owls, Caves and Fossils
  4. 10.1016/j.jas.2007.10.018 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.014 · DOI
  6. Binford L, 1981, Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths
  7. Binford L, 1984, Faunal Remains from Klasies River Mouth
  8. 10.1006/jhev.1995.1046 · DOI
  9. 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.03.013 · DOI
  11. Crezzini J, 2009, L'Età del Ferro a San Sepolcro. Attività produttive e ambiente nel sito di Trebbio, 89
  12. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/jasc.2002.0842 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.007 · DOI
  16. Fowler J, 1993, Statistics for ornithologists
  17. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0348 · DOI
  18. 10.1179/009346906791071972 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/oa.573 · DOI
  20. 10.1006/jasc.1994.1080 · DOI
  21. 10.1006/jasc.2001.0690 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/030504403(88)9008107 · DOI
  23. Palma Di Cesnola A, 1993, Il Paleolitico Superiore in Italia, introduzione allo studio
  24. 10.1006/jhev.1994.1043 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/278934 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.06.007 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.007 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Boschin, F., & Crezzini, J.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali “G. Sarfatti” U.R. Ecologia Preistorica Università degli Studi di Siena Italy
Venue
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-14
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
549-562
ISSN
  • 1047-482X
  • 1099-1212
Cited by
89
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review