The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new protocol to differentiate trampling marks from butchery cut marks
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rockfall can modify bone, producing striations and patterns of bone breakage.
“Rockfall can also modify bone, producing striations and patterns of bone breakage [41–44].”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
Natural traces can mimic cut marks, raising the spectre of equifinality.
“In some cases, these natural traces can mimic cut marks [43–46], raising the spectre of equifinality.”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
Internal microstriations are common on the inner walls of marks produced by stone tools during butchery; they may also be produced by trampling but will not be observed in cases of root etching or tooth mark scoring.
“Internal microstriations: microstriations are common on the inner walls of marks produced by stone tools during butchery; they may also be produced by trampling but will not be observed in cases of root etching or tooth mark scoring [44, 46].”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
Carnivore teeth produce traces with characteristically U-shaped profiles when viewed in cross-section, which are wider and shallower than cut marks, making them easily distinguishable from human modifications.
“Carnivore teeth produce traces with characteristically “U” shaped profiles when viewed in cross-section and which are wider and shallower than cut marks, making them easily distinguishable from human modifications (see below) [44, 51, 52].”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
The relatively deep and narrow incisions on these specimens can hardly result from trampling.
“and the relatively deep and narrow incisions can hardly result from trampling [44].”
From Earliest Human Presence in North America Dated to the Last Glacial Maximum: New Radiocarbon Dates from Bluefish Caves, Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Andrews, 1985, Natural modifications to bones in a temperate setting, Man, 20, 675, 10.2307/2802756 · DOI
- Behrensmeyer, 1986, Trampling as a cause of bone surface damage and pseudo-cutmarks, Nature, 319, 768, 10.1038/319768a0 · DOI
- Blumenschine, 1996, Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces, Journal of Archaeological Science, 23, 493, 10.1006/jasc.1996.0047 · DOI
- Bunn, 1981, Archaeological evidence for meateating by Plio-Pleistocene hominids from Koobi Fora, Kenya, Nature, 291, 574, 10.1038/291574a0 · DOI
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2005, A study of cut marks on small-sized carcasses and its application to the study of cut-marked bones from small mammals at the FLK Zinj site, Journal of Taphonomy, 3, 111
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2003, The use of tooth pits to identify carnivore taxa in toothmarked archaeofaunas and their relevance to reconstruct hominid carcass processing behaviours, Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 1385, 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00027-X · DOI
- Olsen, 1988, Surface modification on bone: trampling versus butchery, Journal of Archaeological Science, 15, 535, 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90081-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Pickering, 2004, New data and ideas on the foraging behavior of Early Stone Age hominids at Swartkrans cave, South African Journal of Science, 100, 215
- Pickering, 2008, Testing the “shift in the balance of power” hypothesis at Swartkrans, South Africa: hominid cave use and subsistence behavior in the early Pleistocene, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27, 30, 10.1016/j.jaa.2007.07.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence for Neandertal Jewelry: Modified White-Tailed Eagle Claws at Krapina
Radovčić, D., Sršen, A. O., Radovčić, J., & Frayer, D. W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119802 · Cited by 275
Halligan, J. J., Waters, M. R., Perrotti, A., Owens, I. J., Feinberg, J. M., Bourne, M. D., Fenerty, B., Winsborough, B., Carlson, D., Fisher, D. C., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600375 · Cited by 259
Bourgeon, L., Burke, A., & Higham, T. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169486 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., de Juana, S., Galán, A. B., & Rodríguez, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2643-2654
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
