Cited by 52Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

H. Pylori as a predictor of marginal ulceration: A nationwide analysis

Schulman, Allison R., Abougergi, Marwan S., Thompson, Christopher C.·2017·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Helicobacter pylori has been implicated as a risk factor for development of marginal ulceration following gastric bypass, although studies have been small and yielded conflicting results. This study sought to determine the relationship between H. pylori infection and development of marginal ulceration following bariatric surgery in a nationwide analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Discharges with ICD‐9‐CM code indicating marginal ulceration and a secondary ICD‐9‐CM code for bariatric surgery were included. Primary outcome was incidence of marginal ulceration. A stepwise forward selection model was used to build the multivariate logistic regression model based on known risk factors. A P value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There were 253,765 patients who met inclusion criteria. Prevalence of marginal ulceration was 3.90%. Of those patients found to have marginal ulceration, 31.20% of patients were H. pylori ‐positive. Final multivariate regression analysis revealed that H. pylori was the strongest independent predictor of marginal ulceration. Conclusions: H. pylori is an independent predictor of marginal ulceration using a large national database. Preoperative testing for and eradication of H. pylori prior to bariatric surgery may be an important preventive measure to reduce the incidence of ulcer development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21759

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulman, A. R., Abougergi, M. S., & Thompson, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Catalyst Medical Consulting, LLC Baltimore Maryland USA
Corresponding author
Thompson, Christopher C.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
522-526
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2589222724
Cited by
52
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007533)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
Helicobacter pylori, marginal ulceration, gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, postoperative complications, risk factors, Helicobacter pylori eradication
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptic Ulcer, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Gastric Bypass, Incidence, Prevalence, Helicobacter pylori, Helicobacter Infections, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review