Cited by 65Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The damaging effects of weight bias internalization

Open access
Kahan, Scott, Puhl, Rebecca M.·2017·Obesity

Abstract

Prejudice, explicit bigotry, and implicit bias have become regular topics of national discourse in our current social and political environments.These discussions have included highly publicized examples of weight-based shaming (1), an unfortunate and frequent symptom of systemic weight stigmatization and discrimination in the United States.Despite increased public attention to weight stigma, few appreciate its extent and damaging impact on health.Weight-based stigmatization is a pervasive yet under-recognized health issue prevalent even in close interpersonal relationships, including parents, spouses, friends, teachers, and healthcare providers (2).Stemming in part from oversimplified and inaccurate beliefs about weight and obesity, weight stigma leads to societal devaluation, discrimination, and rejection of individuals with obesity and excess weight.In addition to damaging consequences for the mental health of those targeted, weight stigma adds insult to the direct injury of obesity, causing physiological stress, weight gain, disordered eating, and other maladaptive behaviors, and may increase mortality (3,4).There is likely a bidirectional relationship between obesity and weight stigma; discrimination is a prominent consequence of living with obesity, and, paradoxically to some, experiencing weight stigma can contribute to further progression of obesity.Weight stigma may mediate relationships between excess weight and a range of negative health outcomes attributed to obesity, including decreased quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21772

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-blame is associated with numerous negative health outcomes.

    “(which itself is associated with numerous negative health outcomes85)”

    From Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity (2018) · cites this paper as [85]

    The paper’s Abstract links weight bias internalization—self-directed, weight-related shaming and negative attitudes—to several adverse health outcomes, including poorer self-reported health, binge eating, and maladaptive health behaviors. It does not establish the same association for self-blame generally, without the weight-related qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Excessive discrepancies between expectations and actual outcomes would be demoralizing and increase negative thoughts and self-blame, and may diminish long-term persistence for behavioral change and weight loss maintenance.

    “it stands to reason that excessive discrepancies between expectations and actual outcomes would be demoralizing and increase negative thoughts and self-blame (which itself is associated with numerous negative health outcomes85), and may diminish long term persistence for continued behavioral change and weight loss maintenance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahan, S., & Puhl, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Kahan, Scott
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-26
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
280-281
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2580947255
Cited by
65
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight bias internalization, weight stigma, weight discrimination, mental health, disordered eating, physiological stress, quality of life, interpersonal relationships, health care discrimination
MeSH terms
Body Image, Body Weight, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Obesity, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review