Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intermittent fasting and protein pacing are superior to caloric restriction for weight and visceral fat loss

Arciero, Paul J., Poe, Michelle, Mohr, Alex E., Ives, Stephen J., Arciero, Autumn, Sweazea, Karen L., Gumpricht, Eric, Arciero, Karen M.·2023·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: This study compared intermittent fasting and protein pacing (IF‐P) versus a heart‐healthy caloric restriction (CR) diet, matched for energy intake and physical activity energy expenditure, on body weight, total and visceral fat mass, and cardiometabolic health outcomes in adults with obesity. Methods: IF‐P ( n = 21) and CR ( n = 20) were assessed pre‐ (week 0), mid‐ (week 5), and post‐ (week 9) intervention. Results: Both groups reduced ( p < 0.05) weight, total and visceral fat mass, blood pressure and lipids, and desire to eat food and increased proportion of fat‐free mass. IF‐P resulted in greater ( p < 0.05) reductions in weight (−9% vs. −5%), total (−16% vs. −9%) and visceral (−33% vs. −14%) fat mass, and desire to eat (−17% vs. 1%) and increased fat‐free mass percent (6% vs. 3%) compared with CR. These improvements were despite similar weekly total energy intake (IF‐P, 9470 ± 550 vs. CR, 9095 ± 608 kcal/wk; p = 0.90) and physical activity energy expenditure (IF‐P, 300 ± 150 vs. CR, 350 ± 200 kcal/d; p = 0.79). Conclusions: IF‐P and CR optimize weight loss, body composition, cardiometabolic health, and hunger management, with IF‐P providing greater benefits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.23660

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arciero et al. have shown superior body composition (reduced total body, fat, and visceral fat mass) with twice-weekly fasting compared with continuous energy restriction.

    “In contrast to these findings, Arciero et al. [4,70,71] have shown superior body composition (reduced total body, fat, and visceral fat mass) with TWF compared with CER.”

    From International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: diets for body weight reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results (BW and composition during WL; page not provided) report greater reductions in body weight, total fat, and visceral fat for intermittent fasting plus protein pacing than for daily caloric restriction. But the Methods (Experimental design; page not provided) say only a subgroup fasted twice weekly during the first four weeks; from week 5, all fasting participants fasted once weekly. The reported overall comparison therefore does not establish the claimed result for twice-weekly fasting throughout. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00271-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/oby.20296 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3390/nu8080476 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/oby.22065 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/14651858.CD013496.pub2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/oby.23023 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/s41430-018-0370-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.arres.2021.100026 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00350 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/ijerph14010059 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001031 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1186/s12937‐022‐00790‐0 · DOI
  13. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00152.2014 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab270 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/oby.23428 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jcsm.12766 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41586-021-03768-w · DOI
  18. 10.1038/d41586-021-01943-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/oby.22449 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/ajcn/nqz330 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.07802 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209353 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.003 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41430-020-0593-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/jn/nxz296 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/obr.12854 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.230 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arciero, P. J., Poe, M., Mohr, A. E., Ives, S. J., Arciero, A., Sweazea, K. L., Gumpricht, E., & Arciero, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Human Nutrition and Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Health and Human Physiological Sciences Skidmore College Saratoga Springs New York USA
  • College of Health Solutions Arizona State University Phoenix Arizona USA
  • Isagenix International LLC Gilbert Arizona USA
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-27
Volume
31
Issue
S1
Pages
139-149
ISSN
  • 1930-7381
  • 1930-739X
Cited by
35
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review