Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weight‐loss interventions for adolescents with Down syndrome: a systematic review

Hilgenkamp, Thessa I.M., Davidson, Emily, Diaz, Keith M., Fleming, Richard, Foster Kirk, Rachel, Hastert, Mary, Kim, Judy, Mann, Sarah, Usseglio, John, Videlefsky, Andrea, Ptomey, Lauren·2025·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Youth with Down syndrome (DS) experience high rates of overweight and obesity; therefore, weight‐loss interventions are warranted. We aimed to systematically review weight‐loss interventions for adolescents with DS to better understand the most effective strategies and identify the current gaps in the literature. Methods: This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] #CRD42022303781). Databases were searched through July 28, 2023, and screening, evaluation, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Change scores for weight or BMI were presented by study design and intervention components. Results: The 26 included papers describing 24 unique studies included a total of n = 1171 participants, of whom n = 393 were participants with DS. Eleven studies focused on physical activity, one on diet, and two on physical activity and diet; seven studies used multicomponent interventions; and three studies investigated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Thirteen studies using either a multicomponent intervention, a physical activity intervention, or surgery resulted in weight loss or a decrease in BMI in adolescents with DS. Conclusions: Weight‐loss interventions can be effective for adolescents with DS and could benefit from increasing duration/intensity to meet the existing weight‐loss intervention recommendations. More research on surgery and weight‐loss medications is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.24233

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence-based weight loss interventions tailored to young adults with ID remain limited.

    “Despite this vulnerability, evidence-based weight loss interventions tailored to young adults with ID remain limited13,14.”

    From A cooking skills intervention for long-term weight loss in young adults with intellectual disabilities: Rationale and design for a randomized trial (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion says the literature is too scarce to inform clinical practice and identifies the review’s population as adolescents aged 13–22, which includes some young adults. The claim extends that finding to young adults with intellectual disability generally, a population the review does not assess as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38402 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/ejcn.2013.137 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.008 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000457952 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/jir.12767 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.046 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.018 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1362361316683888 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/jir.12090 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1362361318791817 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/jar.12465 · DOI
  12. 10.1542/peds.2019‐0137 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/biomedicines9020221 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01305.x · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1744629516686571 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jshs.2012.10.004 · DOI
  17. Allison DB, 1995, Decreased resting metabolic rate among persons with Down syndrome, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 19, 858
  18. 10.1016/S0022-3476(06)80193-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1001/jama.2017.0332 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/ijerph17124294 · DOI
  22. Kmet LM, 2004, HTA #13: Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields
  23. 10.3389/fped.2022.1022738 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/ijpo.12972 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/20473869.2022.2162627 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/17461391.2023.2214805 · DOI
  27. 10.3390/ijerph191912015 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.scispo.2022.02.005 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/ijpo.12816 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.081 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.024 · DOI
  32. 10.3390/ijerph18147441 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.031 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1542/peds.2021‐050261 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103643 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/ijpo.12882 · DOI
  37. 10.1590/S0103-05822014000100015 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.005 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.012 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.02.006 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.006 · DOI
  42. 10.1097/00008486-200116030-00005 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/jar.12642 · DOI
  44. Ordonez FJ, 2006, Influence of 12‐week exercise training on fat mass percentage in adolescents with Down syndrome, Med Sci Monit, 12, CR416
  45. 10.1111/jar.12832 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.029 · DOI
  47. 10.1542/peds.2018-2908 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s11695-021-05393-y · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.021 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1186/1475-2891-12-132 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.003 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602090 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1080/03014460.2020.1808065 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/ijpo.12889 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1001/jama.2024.11146 · DOI
  57. Seron BB, 2015, Blood pressure and hemodynamic adaptations after a training program in young individuals with Down syndrome, Arq Bras Cardiol, 104, 487

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hilgenkamp, T. I. M., Davidson, E., Diaz, K. M., Fleming, R., Foster Kirk, R., Hastert, M., Kim, J., Mann, S., Usseglio, J., Videlefsky, A., & Ptomey, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Physical Therapy University of Nevada Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada USA
  • Department of Pediatrics Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Department of Medicine Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA
  • Department of Exercise and Health Sciences University of Massachusetts Boston Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Hinge Health San Francisco California USA
  • Department of Internal Medicine University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas USA
  • People's Community Clinic Austin Texas USA
  • Mann Method Physical Therapy and Fitness Arvada Colorado USA
  • Augustus C. Long Health Sciences Library Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA
  • Adult Disability Medical Healthcare Clinic Atlanta Georgia USA
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03-10
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
632-658
ISSN
  • 1930-7381
  • 1930-739X
Cited by
7
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review