The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Halogen Bonding versus Hydrogen Bonding: A Molecular Orbital Perspective
Open accessAbstract
We have carried out extensive computational analyses of the structure and bonding mechanism in trihalides DX⋅⋅⋅A− and the analogous hydrogen‐bonded complexes DH⋅⋅⋅A− (D, X, A=F, Cl, Br, I) using relativistic density functional theory (DFT) at zeroth‐order regular approximation ZORA‐BP86/TZ2P. One purpose was to obtain a set of consistent data from which reliable trends in structure and stability can be inferred over a large range of systems. The main objective was to achieve a detailed understanding of the nature of halogen bonds, how they resemble, and also how they differ from, the better understood hydrogen bonds. Thus, we present an accurate physical model of the halogen bond based on quantitative Kohn–Sham molecular orbital (MO) theory, energy decomposition analyses (EDA) and Voronoi deformation density (VDD) analyses of the charge distribution. It appears that the halogen bond in DX⋅⋅⋅A− arises not only from classical electrostatic attraction but also receives substantial stabilization from HOMO–LUMO interactions between the lone pair of A− and the σ* orbital of D–X.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Self-citation
Cited by
σ-Hole Bond vs π-Hole Bond: A Comparison Based on Halogen Bond
Wang, H., Wang, W., & Jin, W. J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00527 · Cited by 631
Halogen Bonds: Benchmarks and Theoretical Analysis
Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct301064t · Cited by 553
Christensen, A. S., Kubař, T., Cui, Q., & Elstner, M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 · Cited by 446
Anion Recognition Strategies Based on Combined Noncovalent Interactions
Molina, P., Zapata, F., & Caballero, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00814 · Cited by 406
Peluso, P., & Chankvetadze, B. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00846 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolters, L. P., & Bickelhaupt, F. M.
- Venue
- ChemistryOpen
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-105
- ISSN
- 2191-1363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166817385
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halogen Bonding versus Hydrogen Bonding: A Molecular Orbital Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/open.201100015
- The paper
- Wolters, L. P., & Bickelhaupt, F. M. (2012). Halogen Bonding versus Hydrogen Bonding: A Molecular Orbital Perspective. ChemistryOpen. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201100015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.