The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services
Abstract
The expectancy disconfirmation model has dominated private‐sector research on customer satisfaction for several decades, yet it has not been applied to citizen satisfaction with urban services. The model views satisfaction judgments as determined—not just by product or service performance—but by a process in which consumers compare performance with their prior expectations. Using data from a New York City citizen survey, this study finds that citizen expectations, and especially the disconfirmation of expectations—factors that previously have not been considered in empirical studies of the determinants of citizen satisfaction—play a fundamental role in the formation of satisfaction judgments regarding the quality of urban services. Interestingly, the modeling results suggest that urban managers should seek to promote not only high‐quality services, but also high expectations among citizens. Additional implications for research and public management practice are discussed. © 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 · Cited by 4,610
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Cited by
Testing the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model of Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui058 · Cited by 301
Internet, trust in government, and citizen compliance
Im, T., Cho, W., Porumbescu, G., & Park, J. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus037 · Cited by 245
Baekgaard, M., Mikkelsen, K. S., Madsen, J. K., & Christensen, J. (2021) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muab011 · Cited by 97
Porumbescu, G. (2017) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1269859 · Cited by 37
Chen, W., Dong, B., Hsieh, C., Lee, M. J., Liu, N., Walker, R. M., Wang, Y., Wen, B., Wen, W., Wu, P., et al. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12860 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Ryzin, G. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-448
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6688
- OpenAlex
- W2099121055
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pam.20020
- The paper
- Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.