Cited by 4,610Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms

Anderson, Eugene W., Sullivan, Mary W.·1993·Marketing Science

Abstract

This research investigates the antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction. We develop a model to link explicitly the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction in a utility-oriented framework. We estimate and test the model against alternative hypotheses from the satisfaction literature. In the process, a unique database is analyzed: a nationally representative survey of 22,300 customers of a variety of major products and services in Sweden in 1989–1990. Several well-known experimental findings of satisfaction research are tested in a field setting of national scope. For example, we find that satisfaction is best specified as a function of perceived quality and “disconfirmation”—the extent to which perceived quality fails to match prepurchase expectations. Surprisingly, expectations do not directly affect satisfaction, as is often suggested in the satisfaction literature. In addition, we find quality which falls short of expectations has a greater impact on satisfaction and repurchase intentions than quality which exceeds expectations. Moreover, we find that disconfirmation is more likely to occur when quality is easy to evaluate. Finally, in terms of systematic variation across firms, we find the elasticity of repurchase intentions with respect to satisfaction to be lower for firms that provide high satisfaction. This implies a long-run reputation effect insulating firms which consistently provide high satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.12.2.125

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Marketing Science
Published
1993-05
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
125-143
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
OpenAlex
W1983364918
Cited by
4,610
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 199 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 202 · 2016: 180 · 2015: 252 · 2014: 288 · 2013: 249 · 2012: 269
FWCI
24.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
customer satisfaction, antecedents of satisfaction, perceived quality, disconfirmation, repurchase intention, quality assessment, corporate reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review