The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An effectiveness‐based evaluation of five state pre‐kindergarten programs
Open accessAbstract
Since 1980, the number of state pre‐kindergarten (pre‐K) programs has more than doubled, with 38 states enrolling more than one million children in 2006 alone. This study evaluates how five state pre‐K programs affected children's receptive vocabulary, math, and print awareness skills. Taking advantage of states' strict enrollment policies determined by a child's date of birth, a regression‐discontinuity design was used to estimate effects in Michigan, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and West Virginia. For receptive vocabulary, only New Jersey and Oklahoma yielded significant standardized impacts, though two of the three other coefficients were in a direction indicating positive effects. For math, all the coefficients were positive but only Michigan and New Jersey yielded reliable results. The largest impacts were for print awareness, where all five coefficients were positive and four were reliable in Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina, and West Virginia. The five states were not randomly selected and, on average, have higher quality program standards than non‐studied states, precluding formal extrapolation to the nation at large. However, our sample of states differed in many other ways, permitting the conclusion that state pre‐K programs can have positive effects on children's cognitive skills, though the magnitude of these effects varies by state and outcome. © 2008 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/504455 · Cited by 4,427
Early Childhood Education: Young Adult Outcomes From the Abecedarian Project
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0601_05 · Cited by 1,144
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.18.2339 · Cited by 846
Van Der Klaauw, W. (2002) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00055 · Cited by 722
Cited by
Weiland, C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12099 · Cited by 701
Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention
Barnett, W. S. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204534 · Cited by 636
Self-citationPreschool Programs Can Boost School Readiness
Gormley, W. T., Phillips, D., & Gayer, T. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156019 · Cited by 253
Durkin, K., Lipsey, M. W., Farran, D. C., & Wiesen, S. E. (2022) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001301 · Cited by 137
Phillips, D. A., Gormley, W. T., & Lowenstein, A. E. (2009) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.05.002 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, V. C., Cook, T. D., Barnett, W. S., & Jung, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-154
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6688
- OpenAlex
- W1982193843
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An effectiveness‐based evaluation of five state pre‐kindergarten programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pam.20310
- The paper
- Wong, V. C., Cook, T. D., Barnett, W. S., & Jung, K. (2008). An effectiveness‐based evaluation of five state pre‐kindergarten programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.