Cited by 636Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and PerformancePoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention

Barnett, W. S.·2011·Science

Abstract

Early educational intervention has been proposed to partially offset the impacts of poverty and inadequate learning environments on child development and school success. A broad range of early educational interventions are found to produce meaningful, lasting effects on cognitive, social, and schooling outcomes. However, all interventions are not equally effective. Two major U.S. programs perform relatively poorly. Research provides some guidance regarding the features of highly effective programs, but much remains to be learned. New experimental studies of key program features would have a high payoff.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1204534

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One random-assignment study of Head Start found that 13 of 22 effects on language, literacy, and math were significant, and of those that achieved significance, the average effect size was 0.18 SD.

    “For example, one random‐assignment study of Head Start, with children enrolled either at age three or age four, found that 13 of 22 effects on language, literacy, and math were significant, and of those that achieved significance, the average effect size was 0.18 SD (Barnett, 2011)”
  • Early childhood educational programs with strong instructional components and those evaluated with strong study designs have large and enduring effects on the educational, social, and health outcomes of participants.

    “A recent review of the effects of early childhood educational programs indicates that programs with strong instructional components and those evaluated with strong study designs have large and enduring effects on the educational, social, and health outcomes of participants.”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnett, W. S.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Barnett, W. S.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
333
Issue
6045
Pages
975-978
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2126455292
Cited by
636
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 26
FWCI
22.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
early educational intervention, program effectiveness, child development, school success, poverty, learning environment, cognitive outcomes, social outcomes, program characteristics, early childhood education
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Educational Measurement, Humans, Infant, Intelligence, Social Behavior, United States, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review