Beyond ‘desirable’ values: Expanding relational values research to reflect the diversity of human–nature relationships
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, environmental values have become increasingly important for understanding human–environment relationships and transitions towards sustainability. Pluralistic valuation seeks to account for values associated with the diversity of human–nature relationships. Relational values (RV) have been proposed as a concept that can aid in plural valuation. RV concern the relationships that people have with their environments. Most RV studies focus on ‘desirable’ or ‘beneficial’ RV that contribute to pro‐environmental actions and sustainable outcomes. We argue that RV could be expanded to understand values that may be less environmentally beneficial. We focus our analysis on RV that exist in ‘simplified’ landscapes. Drawing on our research on cattle‐based livelihoods in Latin America, we highlight potential approaches to the study of RV in such simplified landscapes. We then build on the examples to examine themes and principles of RV with the aim of stimulating discussion about how the concept might be refined and expanded to study a broader range of human–environment relationships. Overall, our aim is to contribute to plural valuation and offer preliminary suggestions for how RV might expand to capture the complexity of values, from those that are desirable to those which contribute to environmental degradation. Expanding the scope of RV research and the depth of the RV concept can help to understand the challenges to sustainability and contribute to the shared goals of sustainability that motivate values research. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cattle ranching seduces individuals, especially men, into a specific form of rural masculinity associated with cowboy culture, carrying a lesser regard for nature.
“It also seduces individualsespecially men into a specific form of rural masculinity associated with the cowboy culture, in a cultural and affective transformation that carries with it a lesser regard for nature (Hoelle et al., 2023).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Hoelle et al., 2023
Section 3.2 describes an appealing cattle culture centred on idyllic ranch life, and Section 3 describes a shift from forest-based livelihoods toward cattle raising and more environmentally impactful relationships with nature. The cited paper does not establish that this appeal is especially directed at men or link it to cowboy masculinity; it also portrays ranchers’ relationships with nature as varied rather than uniformly lacking regard for it. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Pereira, R., Simmons, C., & Walker, R. (2016) · Land · doi:10.3390/land5030024 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Tauro, A. V. (2019). El vínculo entre naturaleza y bienestar humano desde las aspiraciones de pequeños productores rurales en el Trópico seco, México (Doctoral thesis). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Coordinación General de Estudios de Posgrado, UNAM. Retrieved from https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/3430516
- Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020). The politics of co-production: Participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009 · DOI
- Uehara, T., Sakurai, R., & Tsuge, T. (2020). Cultivating relational values and sustaining socio-ecological production landscapes through ocean literacy: A study on Satoumi. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1599–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0226-8 · DOI
- Wallace, R. H., Gomes, C. V. A., & Cooper, N. A. (2018). The Chico Mendes extractive reserve: Trajectories of agro-extractive development in Amazonia. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 48, 184–213. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v48i0.58836 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Hoelle, J., Gould, R. K., & Tauro, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- University of Vermont (US)
- El Colegio de Puebla, A.C. (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Hoelle, Jeffrey
- Venue
- People and Nature
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-16
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1774-1785
- ISSN
- 2575-8314 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223975566
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- People and Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- relational values, environmental values, human-nature relationship, environmental degradation, sustainability transitions, pro-environmental behavior, Latin America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review