Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PTEN genomic deletion is associated with p‐Akt and AR signalling in poorer outcome, hormone refractory prostate cancer

Sircar, Kanishka, Yoshimoto, Maisa, Monzon, Federico A, Koumakpayi, Ismael H, Katz, Ruth L, Khanna, Abha, Alvarez, Karla, Chen, Guanyong, Darnel, Andrew D, Aprikian, Armen G, Saad, Fred, Bismar, Tarek A, Squire, Jeremy A·2009·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

PTEN haploinsufficiency is common in hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer, though the incidence of genomic deletion and its downstream effects have not been elucidated in clinical samples of hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Progression to androgen independence is pivotal in prostate cancer and mediated largely by the androgen receptor (AR). Since this process is distinct from metastatic progression, we examined alterations of the PTEN gene in locally advanced recurrent, non‐metastatic human HRPC tissues. Retrospective analyses of PTEN deletion status were correlated with activated downstream phospho‐Akt (p‐Akt) pathway proteins and with the androgen receptor. The prevalence of PTEN genomic deletions in transurethral resection samples of 59 HRPC patients with known clinical outcome was assessed by four‐colour FISH analyses. FISH was performed using six BAC clones spanning both flanking PTEN genomic regions and the PTEN gene locus, and a chromosome 10 centromeric probe. PTEN copy number was also evaluated in a subset of cases using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. In addition, the samples were immunostained with antibodies against p‐Akt, p‐mTOR, p‐70S6, and AR. The PTEN gene was deleted in 77% of cases, with 25% showing homozygous deletions, 18% homozygous and hemizygous deletions, and 34% hemizygous deletions only. In a subset of the study group, SNP array analysis confirmed the FISH findings. PTEN genomic deletion was significantly correlated to the expression of downstream p‐Akt (p < 0.0001), AR (p = 0.025), and to cancer‐specific mortality (p = 0.039). PTEN deletion is common in HRPC, with bi‐allelic loss correlating to disease‐specific mortality and associated with Akt and AR deregulation. Copyright © 2009 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.2559

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.013 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.211430998 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2174/156800907781662248 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9052 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nrc1015 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.gde.2005.12.003 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/84879 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000059 · DOI · Paper page
  11. McMenamin ME, 1999, Loss of PTEN expression in paraffin‐embedded primary prostate cancer correlates with high Gleason score and advanced stage, Cancer Res, 59, 4291
  12. 10.1002/ijc.22359 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603924 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1210/me.2004-0117 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603184 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/modpathol.3880471 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31815aca30 · doi:10.1097/pdm.0b013e31815aca30
  18. 10.1002/humu.20220 · doi:10.1002/humu.20220
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3597 · DOI
  20. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0465 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/modpathol.2008.20 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604680 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/gcc.20369 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209096 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s00428-004-1004-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/modpathol.2008.96 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0308217100 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0979 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/01.pap.0000184179.50672.f7 · DOI
  30. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4202 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0091 · DOI
  32. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0272 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/978-0-387-69080-3_38 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sircar, K., Yoshimoto, M., Monzon, F. A., Koumakpayi, I. H., Katz, R. L., Khanna, A., Alvarez, K., Chen, G., Darnel, A. D., Aprikian, A. G., Saad, F., Bismar, T. A., & Squire, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-28
Volume
218
Issue
4
Pages
505-513
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2021466588
Cited by
208
References
3
FWCI
16.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.