Cited by 233Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Molecular analysis reveals a genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity of metaplastic breast carcinomas

Geyer, Felipe C, Weigelt, Britta, Natrajan, Rachael, Lambros, Maryou BK, de Biase, Dario, Vatcheva, Radost, Savage, Kay, Mackay, Alan +2 more·2010·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Cancers may be composed of multiple populations of submodal clones sharing the same initiating genetic lesions, followed by the acquisition of divergent genetic hits. Intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity has profound implications for cancer clinical management. To determine the extent of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity in breast cancers, and whether the morphological diversity of breast cancers is underpinned by divergent genetic aberrations, we analysed the genomic profiles of microdissected, morphologically distinct components of six metaplastic breast carcinomas, tumours characterized by the presence of morphological areas with divergent differentiation. Each morphologically distinct component was separately microdissected and subjected to high-resolution microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Each component was also analysed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Clonal relationship between the distinct components was tested by TP53 sequencing and human androgen receptor (HUMARA) X-chromosome inactivation assay. In the majority of cases, all morphologically distinct components from each case were clonal and displayed remarkably similar genetic profiles. In two cases, however, morphologically distinct components harboured specific genetic aberrations. In an adenosquamous carcinoma, the differences were such that only 20% of the genome harboured similar copy number changes. The squamous component displayed EGFR gene amplification, EGFR over-expression and lack of expression of hormone receptors, whereas the lobular component displayed the reverse pattern. The components of a biphasic spindle cell carcinoma harboured similar gains, losses, amplifications of 9p23 and 17q12 (HER2) and identical TP53 mutations, suggesting that these were relatively early events in the development of this tumour; however, each component displayed divergent focal amplifications. Importantly, the metastatic deposit of this case, despite harbouring a TP53 mutation identical to that found in the primary tumour, harboured additional specific focal amplifications. This proof-of-principle study provides direct evidence of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity in breast cancers, and shows that in some cases morphological diversity may be underpinned by distinct genetic aberrations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.2675

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incidents also occur in lesions, and a clonal origin does not exclude heterogeneity within a lesion as demonstrated for breast and other cancers.

    “Incidents also occur in lesions, and a clonal origin does not exclude heterogeneity within a lesion as demonstrated for breast (257) and other (258, 259) cancers.”

    From Pathogenesis of endometriosis: The genetic/epigenetic theory (2019) · cites this paper as [257]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geyer, F. C., Weigelt, B., Natrajan, R., Lambros, M. B., de Biase, D., Vatcheva, R., Savage, K., Mackay, A., Ashworth, A., & Reis‐Filho, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-22
Volume
220
Issue
5
Pages
562-573
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2012751102
Cited by
233
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Breakthrough Cancer Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
metaplastic breast carcinoma, clonal relatedness, adenosquamous carcinoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, EGFR amplification, TP53 mutation, focal amplification, copy number alterations, metastatic deposits, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Humans, Metaplasia, Mutation, Phenotype, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Cluster Analysis, Genes, p53, In Situ Hybridization, Evolution, Molecular, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Microdissection, Comparative Genomic Hybridization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review