Cited by 1,011PARP inhibition in cancer therapyBRCA gene mutations in cancerDNA Repair Mechanisms

Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2

Edwards, Stacey L., Brough, Rachel, Lord, Christopher J., Natrajan, Rachael, Vatcheva, Radost, Levine, Douglas A., Boyd, Jeff, Reis-Filho, Jorge S. +1 more·2008·Nature

Abstract

Cells with loss of BRCA2 function are defective in homologous recombination (HR) and are highly sensitive to inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), which provides the basis for a new therapeutic approach. Here we show that resistance to PARP inhibition can be acquired by deletion of a mutation in BRCA2. We derived PARP-inhibitor-resistant (PIR) clones from the human CAPAN1 pancreatic cancer cell line, which carries the protein-truncating c.6174delT frameshift mutation. PIR clones could form DNA-damage-induced RAD51 nuclear foci and were able to limit genotoxin-induced genomic instability, both hallmarks of a competent HR pathway. New BRCA2 isoforms were expressed in the resistant lines as a result of intragenic deletion of the c.6174delT mutation and restoration of the open reading frame (ORF). Reconstitution of BRCA2-deficient cells with these revertant BRCA2 alleles rescued PARP inhibitor sensitivity and HR deficiency. Most of the deletions in BRCA2 were associated with small tracts of homology, and possibly arose from error-prone repair caused by BRCA2 deficiency. Similar ORF-restoring mutations were present in carboplatin-resistant ovarian tumours from c.6174delT mutation carriers. These observations have implications for understanding drug resistance in BRCA mutation carriers as well as in defining functionally important domains within BRCA2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06548

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutational scars represent genomic history and not current on-going mutational processes that can result in false positive CHORD predictions.

    “We do acknowledge that mutational scars represent genomic history and not current on-going mutational processes that can result in false positive CHORD predictions, which could be for example due to reversion of HRD by secondary frameshifts34,35, or recent acquisition of the HRD phenotype.”

    From Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency. (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, S. L., Brough, R., Lord, C. J., Natrajan, R., Vatcheva, R., Levine, D. A., Boyd, J., Reis-Filho, J. S., & Ashworth, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Memorial Health University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ashworth, Alan
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-02
Volume
451
Issue
7182
Pages
1111-1115
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2065849886
Cited by
1,011
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 63
FWCI
41.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (A8363)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
BRCA2, intragenic deletion, PARP inhibitor resistance, platinum resistance, cisplatin, carboplatin, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, homologous recombination, RAD51 foci, genomic instability, frameshift mutation, error-prone repair, BRCA2 mutation carriers
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Aged, Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Fluorobenzenes, Humans, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Phthalazines, Recombination, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Carboplatin, Open Reading Frames, Mitomycin, Sequence Deletion, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Genes, BRCA2, BRCA2 Protein, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review