The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials
Abstract
Background: Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) have languished in the shadow of success of the outcome of therapy in childhood ALL. Their treatment has always been incorporated into either paediatric or adult clinical trials depending on the mode of referral and hence there is a need to address an age and risk specific strategy for improving the outcome of this neglected group of patients. This article has summarised the recent and updated retrospective comparative analysis of adolescents treated on the Medical Research Council (MRC) trials. This analysis adds further emphasis to the treatment approach and the merits and limitations of treatment of adolescents on paediatric and adult trials. Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of adolescents aged 15–17 years, treated on either MRC ALL97/revised 99 (n = 61), a randomised paediatric trial or UKALLXII/E2993 (n = 67), an adult trial, between 1997 and 2002 was undertaken. Result: Results suggest a trend towards a superior outcome on paediatric trials. The 5‐year EFS on ALL97 was 65% (95% CI = 52–78%) and on UKALLXII/E2993 was 49% (95% CI = 37–61%;P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis allowing for age and Ph status, diminished the EFS difference, but confirmed a reduced rate of death in remission in patients managed on the paediatric protocol. Conclusions: Despite limitations in the methodology, comparative studies including our MRC study suggest a consistent advantage for adolescents managed intensively on paediatric trials. Redefining age limits with risk‐based strategy and multi‐centre collaboration should be considered to improve the survival of young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:254–261. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pui, C.-H., Robison, L. L., & Look, A. T. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60457-2 · Cited by 1,564
L‐asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A focus on Erwinia asparaginase
Pieters, R., Hunger, S. P., Boos, J., Rizzari, C., Silverman, L., Baruchel, A., Goekbuget, N., Schrappe, M., & Pui, C. (2011) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.25489 · Cited by 569
Huguet, F., Leguay, T., Raffoux, E., Thomas, X., Beldjord, K., Delabesse, E., Chevallier, P., Buzyn, A., Delannoy, A., Chalandon, Y., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.6916 · Cited by 567
Results of NOPHO ALL2008 treatment for patients aged 1–45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Toft, N., Birgens, H., Abrahamsson, J., Griškevičius, L., Hallböök, H., Heyman, M., Klausen, T. W., Jónsson, Ó., Palk, K., Pruunsild, K., et al. (2018) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2017.265 · Cited by 409
L-asparaginase in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Egler, R. A., Ahuja, S. P., & Matloub, Y. (2016) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.184769 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramanujachar, R., Richards, S., Hann, I., Goldstone, A., Mitchell, C., Vora, A., Rowe, J., & Webb, D.
- Venue
- Pediatric Blood & Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 254-261
- ISSN
- 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5017
- OpenAlex
- W2043587224
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pbc.20749
- The paper
- Ramanujachar, R., Richards, S., Hann, I., Goldstone, A., Mitchell, C., Vora, A., Rowe, J., & Webb, D. (2007). Adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Outcome on UK national paediatric (ALL97) and adult (UKALLXII/E2993) trials. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.